Humboldt County Grand Jury
• 2013-2014
charter schools.1 Part I of this investigation will address all charter schools with the exception
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
As of November 13, 2013, there was no clear and easily accessible access to the School Accountability Report Cards on the first page of the following charter schools’ websites: Northcoast Preparatory and Performing Arts; Six Rivers Charter High School; and Trillium Charter School.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Northcoast Preparatory and Performing Arts, Six Rivers Charter High School, and Trillium Charter School need to display a clear one-step link to the School Accountability Report Card on the first page of their website, labeling that link “School Accountability Report Card (SARC)” in order to make the school’s data easily accessible to the public and thereby comply with both the letter and the spirit of the law (Ed Code, section 33126(d). (F1) 4 http://internet.humboldt.k12.ca.us/freshwater_sd/FreshwaterElem_SARC%202012.html, December 13, 2013.
F2
California Department of Education published website data and self-reported, hard-copy data often appear to be inconsistent and / or contradictory, especially in the case of Freshwater Charter School’s administrative salary / salaries.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
All charter schools need to check the published California Department of Education data against their own “in house” records to make certain that the data the California Department of Education publishes is accurate. (F2) REQUEST FOR RESPONSES for PART I Pursuant to Penal Code § 933.05, the following responses are required; the Governing Boards of the following schools; (cid:1) Northcoast Preparatory and Performing Arts (R1, R2) (cid:1) Six Rivers Charter High School (R1, R2) (cid:1) Trillium Charter School (R1, R2) The Governing Board of Freshwater Charter School should respond to recommendation 2 to clarify the published administrative salary found at the California Department of Education’s Ed Data website and the self-reported administrative salary submitted to the Grand Jury. SUMMARY – PART II – Mattole Valley Charter School When doing the investigation of Humboldt County’s charter schools, the Humboldt County Grand Jury found many problems with its attempt to obtain clear, transparent, and accurate data for the Mattole Valley Charter School on its website. Such a lack of accuracy and transparency is a violation of Education Code, section 33126(d). The Mattole Valley Charter School’s website also lacked easy access to the School Accountability Report Card and other information that parents might need in order to make informed choices for the education of their children. DISCUSSION – PART II – Mattole Valley Charter School The Mattole Valley Charter School is the least transparent with its public records of all schools the Grand Jury investigated this year. What should be a very simple internet search for the average person wishing to learn about the Mattole Valley Charter School – finding API scores, number of teachers, budgets, and general school qualifications – leads to a frustrating series of dead ends that offer little or no meaningful information without searching further on its website using a “hit or miss” method. The Mattole Valley Charter School Website is http://www.mattolevalley.com/, and it requires many steps to access any useful information. When Mattole Valley Charter’s information is finally accessed by going first to http://www.mattolevalley.com/resources/student-parent-resources/, one must select “resources,” which leads to another menu. On that menu, there is a link that leads to the School Accountability Report Card. However, when one searches the School Accountability Report Card for Mattole Valley Charter School, one does not know if the data is for Mattole Valley Charter School, its sponsoring agent, Mattole Unified School District, or both. If this sounds confusing, it is. Just getting to Mattole Valley Charter School’s School Accountability Report Card is hard enough for the average person making an inquiry into the school. Reading Mattole Valley Charter School’s School Accountability Report Card is just as confusing for the average person with limited to average internet skills, because of the numerous
F3
The position of Superintendent of Mattole Unified District and the Director of the Mattole Valley Charter School are performed by one individual for both institutions, blurring the line between the District’s Local Educational Agency’s oversight obligation for the sponsored Charter School.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Two distinct positions need to be created with one clearly distinct person for each position: one person for the Superintendent of the Mattole Unified District and another person for the Director of the Mattole Valley Charter School in order to avoid any possibility of the appearance of a conflict of interest between the two institutions. (F3)
F4
California Department of Education published website data and self-reported; hard-copy data are inconsistent and / or contradictory with each other, especially as it relates to the number of teachers employed and average daily attendance (ADA) data for Mattole Valley Charter School.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Superintendent of the Mattole Unified School District or his designee needs to check the published California Department of Education’s data against the actual district data to make certain that both sets of data are accurate and consistent. (F4)
F5
The 12 “learning centers” of the Mattole Valley Charter School have no individual data published for the public, either on the Charter School’s own website or on any California Department of Education website.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Mattole Valley Charter School needs to establish meaningful, easily navigated websites for each of its learning centers, including a separate School Accountability Report Card for each of the learning centers in order to assure the public that students in those “learning centers” are receiving sound education. (F5)
F6
The Superintendent of Mattole Unified School District has not been given a formal, written evaluation for several years according to witness testimony.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The Governing Boards of the Mattole Unified School District and the Mattole Valley Charter School are urged to give both the Superintendent of the District and the Director of the charter school an annual, formal, written evaluation. (F6) REQUEST FOR RESPONSES for Part II Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05, the following responses are required: (cid:1) The Governing Boards of the Mattole Union School District and / or the Mattole Valley Charter School. (R1 through R6) Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code § 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.