⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 8 findings
F1
County employees at the Clark Complex told the grand jury the main building of the complex does not comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The County meet ADA access standards at the main building of the Clark Complex.
F2
The hallway near the elections office, serving the ground floor of the Clarke Complex, is used for storage of furniture, desks, obsolete equipment, and other materials; this practice could cause a hazard in case of an emergency.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
The County comply with all fire and safety regulations at the Clark Complex.
R3
The County remove all obsolete materials, equipment, debris, and other materials from the Clark Complex.
R4
The County bring the Clark Complex up to building , fire and safety codes or consider other options for these county offices.
F3
Containers of flammable materials were observed on the ground floor.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
The County comply with all fire and safety regulations at the Clark Complex.
R3
The County remove all obsolete materials, equipment, debris, and other materials from the Clark Complex.
R4
The County bring the Clark Complex up to building , fire and safety codes or consider other options for these county offices.
F4
A significant amount of debris has also accumulated on the ground floor.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
The County comply with all fire and safety regulations at the Clark Complex.
R3
The County remove all obsolete materials, equipment, debris, and other materials from the Clark Complex.
R4
The County bring the Clark Complex up to building , fire and safety codes or consider other options for these county offices.
F5
It is difficult to see because of insufficient lighting on the ground floor hallway.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The County comply with all fire and safety regulations at the Clark Complex.
R4
The County bring the Clark Complex up to building , fire and safety codes or consider other options for these county offices.
F6
Some windows in the main building leak water.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The County comply with all fire and safety regulations at the Clark Complex.
R4
The County bring the Clark Complex up to building , fire and safety codes or consider other options for these county offices.
F7
It was reported that some areas of the main building on the ground floor lack proper security. .
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The County comply with all fire and safety regulations at the Clark Complex.
R4
The County bring the Clark Complex up to building , fire and safety codes or consider other options for these county offices.
F8
The Eureka Fire Department has not reported fire code violations on their inspections of the Clark Complex. CONCLUSIONS C-1 The county has not adequately provided for handicap accessibility in the main building. C-2 The county has not effectively managed the fire and safety hazards of this building; this is causing a hazard to county employees, confined in-patients, and other users of this building. C-3 The county has not effectively disposed of obsolete and unusable material and equipment. C-4 The county is not effectively maintaining the Clark Complex. C-5 The Eureka Fire Department is not effectively inspecting the Clark Complex. RECOMMENDATIONS THE HUMBOLDT COUNTY GRAND JURY RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING:
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Eureka Fire Department review its fire inspection procedures regarding the Clark Complex. RESPONSES THE FOLLOWING RESPONSES TO REPORT 01-13 ARE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO P.C. AND THE STANDARD FORMAT FOR RESPONSES. 1. The Board of Supervisors respond to all findings and recommendations. 2. The Department Head of Administrative Services Division respond to all recommendations and findings. 3. The City of Eureka respond to findings F-2, F-3, F-4, and F-8 and to recommendations R-3, R-4, and R-5.
Conclusions 2
-
CL1 Page 1C-1 The county has not adequately provided for handicap accessibility in the main building. C-2 The county has not effectively managed the fire and safety hazards of this building; this is causing a hazard to county employees, confined in-patients, and other users of this building. C-3 The county has not effectively disposed of obsolete and unusable material and equipment. C-4 The county is not effectively maintaining the Clark Complex.
-
CL2 Page 2C-5 The Eureka Fire Department is not effectively inspecting the Clark Complex.
No Responses Found 2
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Eureka
City
Humboldt County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office