Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

A Report by the 2015-2016 Contra Costa County Grand Jury*

Published: May 24, 2016 10 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
The Office of Public Defender is dedicated and committed to providing the best legal defense possible to those defendants who qualify for its services.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Persons applying for the services of the Public Defender do not sign the financial screening questionnaire under penalty of perjury.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Public Defender should require the potential client referred by the court to attest under penalty of perjury to the accuracy of the information provided to the Public Defender.
F3
The Public Defender does not verify the financial information provided by individuals applying for its services.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
To verify the information provided on the financial eligibility questionnaire form. The Public Defender should develop guidelines concerning when documentation of financial circumstances is required and the type of such documentation, such as prior year tax return, employment pay stubs or advices, utilization of credit services, etc.
F4
The Public Defender refers some potential clients to the Criminal Conflicts Panel because the Public Defender is operating at capacity.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Without verifying financial eligibility it is impossible to ascertain an individual has fraudulently obtained representation from the Office of the Public Defender.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The Public Defender should require the potential client referred by the court to attest under penalty of perjury to the accuracy of the information provided to the Public Defender.
R2
To verify the information provided on the financial eligibility questionnaire form. The Public Defender should develop guidelines concerning when documentation of financial circumstances is required and the type of such documentation, such as prior year tax return, employment pay stubs or advices, utilization of credit services, etc.
F6
Section (c) of California Penal Code section 987 contemplates that a defendant may be prosecuted for perjury based upon false material contained in the financial statement.
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 5

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.