Score: +3 (6/7/3)
Napa County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Napa City-County Library

Published: May 05, 2010 31 pages
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 22 findings

F1
Because of the incomplete analysis of the Library Collection, the needs of the community may not be met, especially the non-English community
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
A review of the Library Collection be given a high priority and in-depth analysis to identify areas which need improvement, expansion, and to ensure that the Collection is meeting the needs of the entire community. In addition, Library Management implements an annual Library customer survey and develops questions, which enable qualitative and quantitative assessment of the Library Services. Survey may be set-up through the Internet 19
F2
The Napa City-County Library Organizational chart is outdated
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Library Director create a new organization chart that depicts the reporting structure of all employees
F3
Twenty-nine percent of the Library Job Classifications are outdated
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Library Management review and update the Library Job Classifications
F4
There are no position descriptions to properly perform employee evaluations
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Library Management create position descriptions to effectively complete employee evaluations
F5
There is no staff-training manual
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Library Management create a training manual for new and existing employees
F6
There are no formal minutes recorded for the staff meetings
No recommendations for this finding
F7
One hundred percent of the 2007 Employee evaluations are untimely and do not adhere to Human Resource Personnel Rules and Regulations “Evaluations for 18 permanent employees shall be completed annually at least two (2) weeks prior to the employee’s anniversary date
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Library Management adhere to regulations for completion of evaluations. Also, Library Director track annual evaluations showing employee name, hire date, date of evaluation and number of days to complete evaluation from hire date. Submit report to CEO
F8
There was a high turnover of Library staff during 2006-08 ranging from a low of 15 percent to a high of 31 percent for permanent employees, and ranging from a low of 20 percent to a high of 46 percent for Extra Help employees
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
An annual Library employee satisfaction survey and turnover survey be conducted and the results of this survey be provided to County Administration
F9
Library staff morale declined and productivity decreased over the last few years
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
An annual Library employee satisfaction survey and turnover survey be conducted and the results of this survey be provided to County Administration
F10
The Master Plan is not being addressed
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The status of the 2007 Master Plan be addressed with the Library Commission and CEO with an action plan submitted as to what recommendations will be implemented including time frames and what recommendations will be postponed with the reason for postponement
F11
The interior of the Calistoga Library is not well maintained and is in need of repair. There is chipped, dirty paint in the public area, plaster flaking in the staff and storage areas, worn-out carpets, poor storage area shelving, and cramped offices
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Calistoga Library be scheduled for renovation in 2009. This renovation to include painting, repairing of the office and storage area and installing appropriate shelving and new carpet in the public area
F12
The storage of book boxes on the Calistoga Library stage creates a public safety hazard
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
Boxes piled high on the stage of the Calistoga Library be removed immediately and acceptable alternative storage areas found
F13
Unrestricted smoking on the terrace of the Napa Main Library may adversely impact visitors and children on the adjacent main entrance sidewalk
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
Smoking on the terrace of the Napa Main Library adjacent to the main entrance sidewalk be restricted
F14
The Library Commission members were not properly trained for their 3-year term, resulting in a lack of knowledge and understanding of how the Library operation is directly tied to Library policies. No training manual and no formal orientation exist for the Library Commission members
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
The Library Commission members have an in-depth training program to include instruction in Library policies, operations, and By-laws as their responsibility is to the Community and to ensure the Library meets its goals. Also, as part of the in- depth training program, a Commissioner’s Handbook be developed which includes at a minimum the following: Library Commission By-laws, ALA Policies, Collection Development Policies, Mission and Value Policies, budget, statistics, long range plan, annual report, require CALTAC Training for all commissioners, attendance at library commission statewide library activity each year
F15
The Library Commission failed to exercise its duties and deferred its power and authority to the Library Director. The By-laws calling for the Library Director to submit quarterly/annual report to the Library Commission are not followed. The Commission’s stated goal of “effectiveness to ensure that the needs of all segments of our community are assessed and considered” was not achieved
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
The Library Director submit quarterly reports to the Library Commission, as required by the Library Commission By-laws, and jointly develop an annual report that is informative and beneficial to the Commission, BOS, and CEO
F16
Library Commission By-laws and Long Range Policy are outdated
Related Recommendations (1)
R13
Library Commission By-laws and Long Range Policy be updated to meet the needs of the community
F17
Exit interviews are not conducted for Extra Personnel. The exit interview form is inadequate
Related Recommendations (1)
R15
Exit interviews for all permanent and Extra Help employees be conducted. Also, exit interview questionnaire be updated to achieve the maximum benefit from the exit interview. Finally, provide an annual summary of the results to the CEO and the Library Director
F18
Monitoring of Library morale and turnover by means of an annual employee satisfaction survey was not conducted
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Training of Library management for performance evaluations is inadequate
No recommendations for this finding
F20
The oversight of the Library Department is inadequate
Related Recommendations (1)
R16
The administrative time commitment for the Library be increased
F21
The Library Department Summary’s performance indicators used to monitor operations are inadequate
Related Recommendations (1)
R17
The County Administration in conjunction with Library Director develop performance indicators enabling the Napa City-County Library to measure its performance, in total or part, with other “similar” Libraries in California and the Bay Area with the goal of improving its performance. Also, ensure the Library 20 Director submits operation statistics with evaluation criteria to provide a better picture of the Library System
F22
The Budget does not have a cost accounting system for Library Branches
Related Recommendations (1)
R18
Cost accounting for the Library branches be implemented COMMENDATION The 2008-2009 Grand Jury commends the new Library Director, Library Management, and Library staff for their dedication and for working together to aggressively move the Napa City-County Library system in a new and positive direction. REQUEST FOR RESPONSES The 2008-2009 Grand Jury request responses from:

Commendations 4

Agency Responses 2

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Napa County County