⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
Page 18
The boring samples were not taken from the area of the excavation where the sewer line was to be installed.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 18
Performance of additional boring along the relocated pipeline and utilization of Dig Alert in the early stages of the project would have identified the concrete highway beneath the asphalt and the additional utility crossovers. Incorporation of this information into the initial bid documents would have eliminated the necessity of returning to the Board of Supervisors for the excessive overrun cost of the allocated budget.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 18
Accurate drawings were not available identifying crossover utilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 25
Parents of both the victims and the bullies are routinely contacted in a bullying situation. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Bullying 17 RECOMMENDATIONS 15-04 All Administration, staff, and parents must consider bullying and maintaining a positive school climate as serious issues. 15-05 Continue to improve a positive school climate and anti-bullying programs following the termination of the grant funds, and include the community and families in that effort. 15-06 Promote and maintain programs that include parents, caregivers, and staff to combat bullying behavior. Responding Agency Recommendations Due Date Fontana Unified School District 15-04 through 15-06 10/01/2015 Victor Valley Union 15-04 through 15-06 10/01/2015 High School District 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Bullying 18 CITY OF COLTON GOVERNANCE BACKGROUND In July 2014, the San Bernardino County Grand Jury initiated an investigation into management and financial record-keeping practices in the City of Colton. Colton is an incorporated city in San Bernardino County, California and is approximately 57 miles east of Los Angeles. According to the 2010 census, the population is approximately 52,000. The Grand Jury investigated concerns including: Record keeping in the Public Works Department related to Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funds including Measure I funds (intended exclusively for transportation projects) The documentation and the approval process for Public Works projects City of Colton council members’ interactions with the city manager and city departments Compliance with requirement for yearly audited financial statements Outdated computer systems Compliance by city staff with document retention policies for project files and computer backup data METHODOLOGY The Grand Jury conducted interviews with current and former employees of the City of Colton (the City) including line staff and management personnel, reviewed Colton’s policies and procedures, examined a sample of Public Works files, and read various financial materials. Two site visits to the City were undertaken as part of the investigation. FACTS According to information published by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), Measure I is the half-cent sales tax collected throughout San Bernardino County for 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury –City of Colton Governance 19 transportation improvements. Nineteen percent of the revenue is returned to the cities for use on local road improvement projects. These projects include the widening of streets, the installation of traffic signals, road maintenance efforts, storm drain facilities, bridges, upgrades to meet American Disabilities Act standards and other projects related to local transportation. This 20 year half-cent sales tax has provided nearly $10 million for Colton’s streets and roads since implementation 18 years ago. Local officials make decisions about the allocation of these funds. Projects that are funded by the City without the use of Measure I revenues are categorized as CIP. The Grand Jury reviewed the Public Works Department files for both CIP and Measure I projects. The City has approved a five year plan for Measure I funds. The project folders for Public Works contained documentation from start to completion of the projects. Financial records are consistently maintained and readily available to Public Works staff at all times. The Finance Manager in Public Works can directly access and input data to the computer financial system. All financial audits conducted by SANBAG and California Department of Transportation, as well as the city’s independent auditor, did not reveal questionable accounting practices on public works projects. Completed project files are maintained in file cabinets in an office area for three years. The files are then transferred to a warehouse storage area for seven years or more. There is no off-site storage area for archival of Public Works files and records. Off-site storage may include storage at a disaster proof facility, storage at remote location, or on a “cloud” type system. The Grand Jury reviewed how public works projects are prioritized and whether city staff is complying with the City’s procedures and guidelines. The Grand Jury specifically reviewed the approval process for the construction of speed bumps on city streets. City documents revealed that the projects at issue were completed consistently with the City’s established procedures and guidelines. The Grand Jury uncovered no evidence to support allegations that favoritism was given to elected officials in the decision to approve construction of the speed bumps. There were concerns regarding city work performed on private property of a council member. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury –City of Colton Governance 20 The work was found to have been completed consistently with City policies and procedures. A city owned utility pole was removed and resulted in damages to a block wall on private property. The block wall was repaired to its original state, as required by city policy. Documentation of the above projects is available to the public and has been confirmed by an independent investigative firm and an internal City review of complaints. Interviews failed to support concerns that individual City council members were unduly involved in day-to-day city operations. City staff did not report feeling pressured to handle matters in certain ways for individual council members. Financial reports are currently up-to-date and a newly hired Finance Manager has established procedures for maintaining records. Financial reports are available to staff on the computer system and by hardcopy on request. Archived financial records are maintained in boxes at a warehouse in the Public Works Department. No off-site storage is utilized. The City of Colton is in the process of updating all computers to the latest operating systems and financial software. At the time of the Grand Jury’s visit, 50 computers remained out of 250 to be updated. Off-site storage of computer backup media is not being used. There are no procedures in place to restore the existing backup at an alternate location in case of a catastrophic event such as an earthquake or fire. Each computer user in City government has a unique log on. A user can access information from any computer in the City so long as the computer being used is supported by appropriate software. Interviews confirmed existing storage times for backed up data do not meet the document retention schedule established by the City of Colton. Additional personnel are being hired to maintain and support the Information Technology (IT) Department as City finances improve. A forward looking plan is being considered for IT modernization in the City of Colton; however, the plan is currently too expensive to implement. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury –City of Colton Governance 21 City of Colton Policies and Procedures are not actively being reviewed and updated, but are updated when an issue arises and it is apparent that the policy or procedure is obsolete. For example, Policy and Procedures Section 4.04 titled Employer/Employee Relations was most recently revised in 2005. A second example is Section 2.03, Accounting, which was last revised in 1991. A separate indexing system is used to determine the date of adoption or revision of the policy or procedure. FINDINGS 1. The City of Colton correctly administers and audits Measure I funds, as well as funds from other sources.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 113
Access to San Bernardino OffenderWatchⓇ is easy for computer users as it involves just one computer click from the San Bernardino Police Department home page; however, information is limited for users.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 113
The number of registered sex offenders provided on Department of Justice (DOJ) Megan’s Law website for the city of San Bernardino is a more complete list (640 on May 19, 2015) than the number of sex offenders on the San Bernardino Police Department OffenderWatchⓇ website (6 on May 19, 2015). 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Registered Sex Offender Websites 105 RECOMMENDATION San Bernardino Police Department 15-14 Modify the San Bernardino Police Department website so the public can click on a large icon similar in font and size to the Offender Watch icon so a more thorough access to records of registered sex offenders can be easily obtained. Also, the website should provide a warning to the public to check both databases as the Department of Justice (DOJ) Megan’s Law website has a more complete listing. COMMENDATION Fontana Police Department Commendation to Fontana Police Department for providing personnel and financial resources to maintain the Offender Watch program to ensure that the information is current and accessible to the public. Responding Agency Recommendation Due Date San Bernardino Police Department 15-14 10/01/2015 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Registered Sex Offender Websites 106 SAN BERNARDINO CITY ANIMAL SHELTER BACKGROUND The 2014-2015 Grand Jury investigated the City of San Bernardino Animal Shelter. Within the State of California, animal shelters are required to adhere to Senate Bill 1785 that was introduced in 1988 by Senator Hayden and became the Hayden Law. A provision of the Hayden Law that pertains to this investigation is Section 1(c)(2) “the shelter consolidate and list clear guidelines for all animals held in the shelter.” METHODOLOGY The Grand Jury scheduled an interview with the staff of the City of San Bernardino Animal Shelter hereafter called the Shelter. The visitation allowed the Grand Jury to observe the operation of the facility. The scope of the investigation was whether the Shelter followed its policies and procedures, as well as those policies covered by the Hayden Law. The Grand Jury requested a copy of the Shelter’s policies and procedures. FACTS At the time of the Grand Jury’s visit to the Shelter and based on its interview with Shelter staff, there were two position vacancies: a veterinarian and registered veterinarian technician. The Shelter utilizes a program where a veterinarian visits two hours a week. The Shelter has contracts with other veterinarians who provide emergency medical services to the animals if needed. The Shelter can provide minor medical services. The Shelter is under contract with a hospital where the animals are taken when more extensive medical attention is needed. The Shelter has hired a registered veterinarian technician (Animal Control Manager). The contracted Drug Enforcement Agency certified veterinarian can direct the staff on administering medications. The staff of the Shelter can receive on-the-job training to administer medications. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino City Animal Shelter 107 Cleaning and disinfecting of kennels and cages were observed during a tour of the Shelter. Food dishes are sanitized daily in a large industrial cleaner. Very hot water is used to kill germs and bacteria. Steam was visible to the Grand Jury during the cleaning process. Some of the cats bedding was being changed in the presence of the Grand Jurors during their visit. Multiple washers and dryers assist the staff in maintaining cleanliness. Animal food is kept in a separate secure metal container. Bags of food were closed and neatly piled. Food is frequently donated from local companies and individuals. There was no evidence of loose food or rodents. The general grounds are hosed down and neatly kept. Staff communicates when moving animals from their kennels/cages to adjacent holding areas while the sanitizing is occurring. Identification tags mention the animal’s temperament including feral, aggressive, or timid to assist the staff if any special handling was needed. Injuries are also noted on the tags. The Chameleon System is a database utilized to enhance communication. The database provides a detailed history for animals from the time they arrive to final disposition. All medical records are posted in the system and reviewed by staff. The Chameleon System tracks reported animal placement, medication, payments, and receipts. The system also includes pictures of the animals. The Shelter has published Policies and Procedures that relate to the operation of the facility and humane treatment of animals. Standard Operating Procedures include the beginning of shift, radio/cellphone use, and end of shift procedures. The most important policies deal with the health and welfare of the animals while in the Shelter’s custody. For example, all animals are weighed upon intake. Healthy appearing animals are given physicals while animals that do not appear healthy or appear to be abused are given more comprehensive physicals. The staff looks for symptoms of infectious diseases such as canine distemper. Another policy deals with serious bites that may result in mandatory quarantine at the shelter or an authorized veterinary clinic. In addition, there are many other policies and procedures. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino City Animal Shelter 108 FINDINGS 1. Investigation of the San Bernardino City Animal Shelter indicates the facility is clean, operating efficiently, and according to provisions of Hayden Law. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino City Animal Shelter 109 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT AVIATION AND TOWING INVESTIGATIONS BACKGROUND Aviation Division The Aviation Division (Division) of San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department (SBCSD) provides general law enforcement, narcotics surveillance, personnel/cargo transport, airborne photography, search and rescue, pursuit coordination, fire suppression and medical services transport with helicopters as well as fixed wing aircraft. Division aircraft are also used to assist other county employees in the performance of their duties, and civilians are often allowed to Ride-Along with SBCSD employees. The Division consists of pilots, Tactical Flight Officers (TFO), mechanics and support staff. Vehicle Towing During SBCSD investigations, vehicles may be towed and/or impounded for various law enforcement purposes. The SBCSD enters into Tow Service Agreements (TSA) with private towing companies to assist in the towing and impoundment of vehicles. These TSAs with the towing companies are renewed annually. According to these agreements, towing companies called to provide towing services are rotated after each service call to ensure fairness in towing service assignments. Aero Squadron The Aero Squadron, formerly known as the Civil Air Patrol, conducts air search, rescue, evacuation, damage assessment and assists in Emergency Disaster activities and other assigned duties as may be directed by the Sheriff of San Bernardino County. They are an organization consisting of civilian volunteers and reserve Deputy Sheriffs. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 110 METHODOLOGY Aviation Division The Grand Jury reviewed SBCSD Aviation Division and Patrol Station policies and procedures provided by the SBCSD. These manuals contain rules and regulations for which SBCSD employees must adhere. The Grand Jury also interviewed numerous SBCSD employees for information regarding compliance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). Both the Aviation Division SOP Manual (June 30, 2013) and the Aviation Unit Policy Manual (May 9, 2014) were reviewed. An in-depth review of the Aviation Division Flight Logs and helicopter Ride-Along waivers were reviewed to discover any inconsistencies in policy and/or procedures. Vehicle Towing The Grand Jury reviewed the current SBCSD Manual revised in 2014, and the SBCSD Tow Service Agreement (TSA) revised in February 2015. The Grand Jury also reviewed policies and agreements in effect at the time of the investigation. The SBCSD Manual contains the rules and regulations for all employees of the SBCSD. The TSA contains the rules and regulations that a tow company agrees to comply with in order to receive a towing rotation list, a tow list used in a rotating manner with the SBCSD. The Grand Jury also reviewed the California Department of Motor Vehicle regulations regarding how to conduct a lien sale for a vehicle. Towing logs and contracts with private towing companies from various patrol stations were reviewed for accuracy of and adherence to the towing rotation lists. Aero Squadron Information from fuel logs, refueling dates, and staff/unit meetings from the Aero Squadron Roster was reviewed. The following information was provided by the SBCSD: San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department 2014 Aero Squadron Roster San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Aviation Division Maintenance Fuel Logs, 2012 thru 2014 Aero (Civil Air Patrol) meeting agendas from 7/1/12 thru 6/30/14 with attendance rosters 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 111 FACTS Aviation Division Investigation The Grand Jury investigated the use of SBCSD Aviation helicopters for civilian Ride-Alongs. According to SBCSD interviews, civilian Ride-Alongs are frequently used for public relations purposes. The Grand Jury reviewed the Aviation Division’s SOP Manual and located three policies governing civilian Ride-Alongs. Section 1.17.3 states, “All requests for a Ride-Along should be handled through Operations or Watch Commander. It is suggested that riders not request more than one ride per calendar year...” Section 2.1.0- Patrol Flight Logs. “All Tactical Flight Officers (TFO) assigned to a patrol shift shall complete a daily flight log during the course of each shift. The patrol log should be inputted at the end of each shift. Each TFO should include the following information: Ride- Along: Item #4 of the above section includes: The name(s) of the authorized guest rider(s) after the proper waiver(s) has/have been signed.” Aviation Division SOP Policy Manual #14 - Passengers states: “Except when required to accomplish the mission, all passengers aboard a Department aircraft shall have the approval of Aviation Unit staff personnel or above.” SBCSD Manual has policies for civilian Ride-Alongs in patrol vehicles. Section 1.818 - Department Ride-Along Program, outlines the procedure for a civilian to Ride-Along with a patrol officer in a patrol vehicle. The policy outlines the following requirements for approval: ● Submitting a completed application/waiver to the division at least five days prior to the requested Ride-Along date ● A criminal background check by accessing available criminal databases ● The applicant’s name shall also be queried through the Tiburon “Special Flags” section to determine the extent to which the applicant has participated in the program in the past 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 112 ● The division commander or his designee shall review the application and supporting documentation, and determine whether to approve or deny the request. In no case shall the commander’s designee be below the rank of sergeant ● The division commander or his designee shall, upon approval of the Ride-Along application, schedule the Ride-Along with the applicant. He shall enter, or cause to be entered, the Ride-Along application information into the “Special Flags” section of the Tiburon database ● At the time of the scheduled Ride-Along, prior to allowing the participant to go into the field, the shift watch commander shall review the application packet to ensure it has been properly completed, the background check has been completed, the application has been approved, and entry has been made into the “Special Flags” system ● The shift watch commander shall also ensure that the Ride-Along time is documented in the shift log, and the paperwork is properly stored in division files Information was provided by SBCSD personnel regarding the number of civilian Ride-Along flights ranging from five to seven per week. The Grand Jury attempted to determine the actual number of civilian Ride-Along flights and whether the department was complying with departmental SOPs. The Grand Jury reviewed Aviation flight logs from September 2012 to September 2014. Aviation Division SOP appears to use the terms flight log and patrol log interchangeably. The flight log includes the following information: date, time, pilot, TFO, call (minutes spent on dispatched call), total time activity, shift, location and disposition. In addition, the Hobbs flight time indicator in the cockpit shows start and finish time which is recorded on the flight log. All of this information is then recorded on a computerized log. The flight log provides a description of the flight in the “activity” and “disposition” columns. Examples of activities recorded in the “activity” column included general patrol activities such as robbery, failure to yield-pursuit, man with a handgun, foot pursuit- suspect running from officer, and suspicious character- subject appears to be casing residences. Also included in the column were non-patrol activities such as Ride-Alongs, training flights, administration flights and event flybys. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 113 The Grand Jury requested Aviation Division waivers for flight Ride-Alongs for a period of three years and was provided waivers from January 2013 through February 2015. The Grand Jury also reviewed flights listed on a SBCSD employee personal flight log. The Grand Jury investigation revealed that not all helicopter flights were recorded on the Aviation flight logs. The Grand Jury randomly selected for study two individual time periods of two months each for a total of four months. Twenty-eight civilian Ride-Along waivers fell within the four month time frame. The Grand Jury found that the flights with the twenty-eight civilian guest riders were not recorded on the Aviation flight logs. SBCSD Aviation pilots also maintain a personal flight log. The Grand Jury reviewed a personal flight log of a person authorized to pilot a SBCSD helicopter. The Grand Jury compared the first eight flights recorded on the personal flight log with the Aviation flight logs. One of the eight flights included a known civilian Ride-Along flight involving four individuals. Seven of the eight flights which included the civilian Ride-Along flight were not recorded on the Aviation flight logs. The Grand Jury verified through interviews with SBCSD personnel that no policies existed that required “unscheduled flights” to be recorded. A review of the waiver forms completed by civilian passengers revealed that of the 200 waivers received, only 39 waivers were complete and approved per department policy. The remaining 161 waivers (80% of the total provided) were incomplete with no background check verification, no authorized signature, and in some cases, missed required information. Vehicle Towing Investigation The Grand Jury investigated the SBCSD agency’s policies and procedures related to employees purchasing vehicles at lien sales after a vehicle has been impounded by a tow company or after a vehicle had been seized during an investigation. The Grand Jury reviewed the Tow Service Agreements (TSA) between SBCSD sub-stations and tow companies. The TSAs specify the rotation for approved tow yards to be utilized. However, 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 114 the TSAs also specifically state “that a station commander, his designee, a supervisor or a scene manager may request tow service outside the normal rotation”. Also, it was discovered that an addendum ( -69) had been added to the prior TSA, revised February 2013. Only one Sheriff’s Station TSA added an addendum ( (a)) to this addendum. This additional addendum stated: “All companies participating in the TSA will no longer be allowed or permitted to sell and or give vehicles, motorcycles, motorized vehicles and or any other property directly related to the towing businesses that are currently enrolled in the TSA to a Sheriff’s department employee and or their immediate family.” The terms of the addendum that were a part of all the prior TSA have been incorporated in the revised TSA. The additional addendum, which was included in only the one station’s TSAs, has been deleted. Vehicle Towing Departmental Policy Addition/Revision was proposed for Section 1.636 Rewards and Gratuities of the SBCSD Manual, in March 2014. The proposed revision was added to the current SBCSD Manual and stated as follows: “In the performance of his duty, Deputy Sheriffs frequently seize the personal property of citizens. The act of seizing another’s property is one of the most invasive and litigated activities by law enforcement. In order to avoid any appearance that a seizure was for personal gain, employees shall not possess property that has been seized by the Department. This includes the purchase of seized property by a third party for an employee’s use.” The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has specific rules to be followed and forms to be completed for the lien sale of a vehicle, a process which is outlined in the California Civil Code (CCC), §3071 and 3072. As long as the process is followed, there is nothing preventing a tow yard from lien selling a vehicle to whomever they choose. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 115 Aero Squadron The Grand Jury tabulated information from the fuel logs on a spreadsheet cross referencing the refueling dates, the Aero Squadron pilots with their personal aircraft identification numbers, and the amount of fuel obtained. The meeting agendas for the Staff meetings, Unit Meetings (full membership) and the scheduled training dates were reviewed and compared with the refueling dates. The results of the review from July 2012 through June 2014 are as follows: Aero Squadron Staff Meetings were scheduled every month on the second Wednesday. There were a total of 22 meetings with the exceptions of no agendas provided for October 2012, December 2012, and December 2013. However, two meeting agendas were provided for the month of September for the dates of Monday 9/10/2012 and Wednesday 9/12/2012. No fuel was recorded to have been dispensed on most of these meeting dates except 8/12/12, 3/13/13, 4/9/14 and 6/11/14 to a total of only four aircraft. Aero Squadron Unit Meetings (full membership) were scheduled every month on the third Wednesday. There were agendas for 21 meetings. No agendas were provided for November 2012, December 2012 and December 2013. No fuel was recorded to have been dispensed on all of these meeting dates except one, 1/16/13 to only one aircraft. The only information on training dates was that they were scheduled for every fourth Saturday of the month. From July 2012 through June 2014 there were twenty-four potential training dates. The fuel records show only fourteen training dates in which fuel was dispensed. Thirty-seven aircraft were fueled on non-scheduled meeting dates from July 2012 through June 2014. Numerous fuelings were made within days before and after the various scheduled and training dates. Fifty-six aircraft were fueled on the 14 recorded training dates. This averages to 4 aircraft per training session. If the thirty-seven aircraft that were fueled on the non- 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Aviation and Towing Investigations 116 scheduled dates were averaged over the remaining unscheduled ten training dates, this would result in an average of 3.7 aircraft per session. This calculation accounts for all the fuel on the ten unscheduled dates that were rescheduled. No data is available that points to any misuse of the fueling privilege. FINDINGS Aviation 1. Not all flights are recorded in the Aviation Flight Logs.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 4
-
CL1 Page 76Inmate Grievances: Zero
-
CL2 Page 49Citizen Complaints: Zero
-
CL3 Page 49Major Incidents: Zero
-
CL4 Page 76Table of Contents of the Manual (s) – Not Applicable DOCUMENT REVIEW INMATE GRIEVANCES/COMPLAINTS: TYPES RESOLUTIONS Zero Total Inmate Grievances/Complaints reviewed: Zero MAJOR INCIDENTS TYPES RESOLUTIONS Zero Total Complaints reviewed: Zero COMMENTS AND CONCERNS OBSERVED DURING THE TOUR: One area of concern was no documentation is maintained onsite of any inmate grievances, complaints or major incidents. If anything is reported, it is documented and goes to the inmate’s home detention center. A copy of the documents should reside at the point of the occurrence. AB109 QUESTION - Not Applicable 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 68 * * * INSPECTION FORM * * * Please fill out those sections that apply to the facility you are inspecting FACILITY NAME: INSPECTION DATE: Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center August 27, 2014 FACILITY CAPACITY: 1,446 LAST BOARD OF STATE AND CURRENTLY: 1,223 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS INSPECTION DATE: March 2013 ADDRESS: Telephone Number: (909)473-2511 18000 Institution Road Fax Number: (909)473-3633 San Bernardino, CA 92407 SITE TOUR -AREA INSPECTED/REVIEWED - (Please Check Areas Seen) QUALITY OF LIFE PROGRAMS PERSONS INTERVIEWED Physical Plan X Educational X Inmates X Meals/Nutrition X Vocational X Facility Manager X Mental Health X Community Services X Medical X Physical/Dental Health X Domestic Violence X School Staff X Religious Services X Victim/Gang Awareness Mental Health Staff X Visiting X Substance Abuse X Line Staff X Volunteer Involvement Other Food Services Staff X 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 69 Any Additional Information/Notes: This facility has housing cells known as “blocks” with single and dual bunks for maximum security; dormitory units house 360 inmates each known as M-1 and M-2 minimum security. There is a women’s dormitory, which houses a maximum of 270 inmates in minimum security. A two story facility houses a maximum of 56 inmates in minimum and maximum security. This facility has an educational program known as INROADS (Inmate Rehabilitation through Occupational and Academic Development Systems) which provides academic, vocational and intervention classes. GENERAL INFORMATION What is the capacity of the facility? 1,446 What is the current number of pretrial inmates? 423 What is the current number of sentenced inmates? 800 Has the facility exceeded capacity since last year’s inspection? No What is the average length of detention? 617 Days What is the inmate classification system? Describe: The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department classification system has been centralized over the last 18 months. The Classification/Population Management Unit (CCU) does all the classification for the entire Detention and Correction Bureau. Inmates are classified during booking at West Valley Detention Center, Central Detention Center or High Desert Detention Center. The inmates are classified as a 1-7. Inmates classified as a 1 are the highest security inmates and 7 are the lowest. The other classifications are Protective Custody, Administrative Segregation and Unusual Behavior for inmates with mental disabilities. All the Type II detention center dorms and cells are rated for a certain classification of inmate. The Classification Unit can see where there is room for a particular inmate and send the inmate to any Type II detention center in the county. This method of classification has brought bureau-wide consistency and has helped manage the inmate population. In 2013 the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Classification System was studied by professors at California State San Bernardino and validated as an accurate and safe classification tool. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 70 Number of weekend offenders? Currently there are zero Work Release inmates; 1,220 Weekender inmates; and 321 inmates on Electronic Monitoring. Number of inmate suicides in the last year? Zero Number of attempted suicides in the last year? Zero Number of deaths from other causes in the last year? Zero Numbers of escapes in the last year? Zero Date of last fire/emergency drill? Staff reports fire drills are impractical, but in an emergency, evacuations can be done in stages. There is a process that is followed and all emergency exits are clearly marked and posted. INDIVIDUAL CELLS/ROOM Condition of walls? Good, well maintained Personal possessions allowed and stored in cell/room (art, books, etc.)? Yes Graffiti present? Generally no, however, in the Discipline Area some graffiti was present. Ample bedding? Yes. All bedding is off the floor. LOCAL INSPECTIONS – Not Addressed STAFFING What is the staff to inmate ratio? The staff to inmate ratio varies, depending on the housing unit. For instance, Minimum 1 Housing Unit is capable of housing 360 inmates and employs three deputy sheriffs, which represents 120:1ratio. On the other hand, Glen Helen North is capable of housing 70 inmates and employs one deputy sheriff which represents 70:1 ratio. Does staff communicate in language that an inmate can understand? Yes, if an interpreter is needed, there is a contract in place to accommodate all languages. Languages are also available in Spanish, Finnish, Swedish, Polish and Vietnamese by staff. Diversity and gender of staff? There are numerous cultures on staff. There are 56 males and 14 females on the staff. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 71 Impression of staff/inmate interactions? Great working relationship with mutual respect and dignity. CONDITION OF THE GROUNDS Lawns, exercise area and equipment, asphalt, other: Excellent condition, the grounds were clean and well maintained. EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS General Condition: paint, roof, drains, gutters, other: Good Safety and security including fencing, outdoor lighting. Fencing height increased to 14 feet, outdoor lighting was good. INTERIOR OF BUILDINGS Walls, paint, floors, drains, plumbing fixtures, air vents, windows, other: Good Condition of the interior of the building noting graffiti, peeling paint, unpleasant odors, or other signs of deterioration? Mild deterioration due to age in the bathroom areas. General cleanliness of the facility including windows, lighting, lockers, desks, conditions of the mattresses, bedding and pillows? Excellent Condition of sleeping room door panels? Good Temperature of living units and classroom? Overall good; Air conditioner in one wing was being repaired. If a court holding area is present in the facility, ensure access to toilet and drinking water? Not applicable Are there adequate supplies (books, paper, computers, etc.)? Yes Are cleaning fluids and chemicals labeled and safely stored? Yes Is the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) available? Yes Weapons Locker present? Yes, located in the Administration Office. Recreation/sports equipment? In good shape Are the hallways clear? Yes Are the doors secured? Yes Propped open or closed? No 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 72 Holding areas (cells/rooms) – (if present), is there access to drinking water and toilet? Yes Are there individual cells/rooms, or dormitories? Yes, all three types. Beds – Type of bed and is it off the floor? Off the floor bunks. Adequate lighting? Yes Adequate temperature? Yes air conditioned throughout ORIENTATION OF INMATES Are inmates oriented to rules and procedures? Yes. Upon booking, inmates are provided an orientation pamphlet outlining the facility rules and regulations. Each morning at 09:39 hours the Inmates Orientation Video is played over the facility television system. The video provides information on inmate rules, regulations and available programs. It will first be played in English and then Spanish. Are rules and grievance procedures posted? Yes. There is a laminated copy of the rules and grievance procedures posted on the wall at the end of each housing unit. Are there procedures for handling citizen and inmate complaints? Yes. Department policies require that a complaint form be issued upon request. The complaint is logged then sent to Internal Affairs. The complaint is then assigned for investigation. Are rules and grievance procedures understood by inmates? Yes. English and Spanish versions of the inmate rules and grievance procedures are provided. Other languages will be provided upon request. There is also an on call interpreter if needed. Inmates interviewed? No Number interviewed: Zero Comments: None MEALS/NUTRITION Is the kitchen area clean? Yes. Are knives and chemicals secured? Yes. The knives are tethered and inventoried by staff at the beginning, middle and end of each shift. The chemicals are secured by staff. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 73 Have the inmates working in the kitchen been trained? Yes. Some are trained prior to their incarceration. Others are trained by staff. Each inmate attends an 8 hour food handler’s class and receives certification. Have the inmates had a medical clearance/review before assignment? Yes. They are medically cleared before being assigned to any kitchen detail. Are meals served in the cell, dayroom or at a central cafeteria? Yes. Meals are served dependent upon inmate’s classification. Are inmates permitted to converse during meals? No Length of time allowed for eating? A minimum of 15 minutes unless they are considered “slow eaters” by the medical staff. PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF INMATES What is the appearance of inmates (dirty, unkempt, well groomed, etc.)? Well groomed Is the inmate’s appearance well-groomed? Yes Showers – frequency, privacy, maintained, supervised by staff? Yes Is facial hair allowed? Yes. Mustaches are to be trimmed at the side of the mouth not to extend over the upper lip. Beards and goatees are not permitted unless it is for religious purposes. Are there any reported assaults by inmates on inmates? Yes. An average of 12 per month. Condition of clothing (does the clothing fit, is it appropriate for the weather, etc.)? Yes PROGRAMS Is exercise inside or out? Outside How frequently is exercise offered? A minimum of 2 times per week. How much exercise time is each inmate offered? A minimum of 3 hours per week. Do men get more exercise time than the women? No. Are there clergy available to inmates upon request? Yes. Inmates may attend religious services or put in an Inmate Request Slip to speak to the facility Chaplain. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 74 Can a request for clergy be made for emergency reasons? Yes. Chaplains are on call for urgent benevolent or religious reasons. They deliver death notices or messages of a traumatic nature to inmates and or staff. Are there religious services? Yes. Inmates have the opportunity to participate in religious services and receive religious counseling. There is Bible study every Sunday. Catholic and non-denominational services provided. What faiths? There are volunteer chaplains available for any religion upon request. Are anger management and other applicable programs available? Yes. Anger Management, Parenting, Substance Abuse, and Marriage and Family Programs are available through the INROADS Program. What type of onsite health facility is available to inmates? There are exam rooms for sick calls. Medications are distributed as medically necessary. Are medical services available? Yes. Dental and X-rays are handled at West Valley Detention Center. How frequently is medical staff onsite? 24 hours/7 days a week – There is a minimum of one RN and one LVN on site for each shift and a total of 8 medical staff members. How long do inmates wait to be seen? Requests for services are responded to within 16- 24 hours and all urgent requests are seen immediately. Is a physician available by phone or on call? A doctor is at the facility twice a week for a total of 8 hours. A Nurse Practitioner is available 16 hours per week. There is also a doctor on call through Arrowhead Regional Medical Center 24 hours/7 days a week. What off-site hospital is used for serious health issues? Arrowhead Regional Medical Center Are mental health services available? Yes How frequently is mental health staff onsite? A Clinician is on site 5 days a week. A psychiatrist is on call. How long do inmates wait to be seen? Requests for services are responded to within 24- 48 hours. In emergency situations, nursing staff will assess mental health requests when mental health staff is not available. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 75 What type of onsite dental facility is available to inmates? Any dental treatment is held off the facility. Female inmates are transported to West Valley Detention Center and the males are transported to Central Detention Center. How are inmates transported to off-site facilities? The hospital transportation deputy sheriff will transport an inmate in a van and an ambulance is used in emergency situations. How is security handled for off-site visits? Inmates are handcuffed or shackled before being transported. A deputy sheriff will ride in an ambulance with an inmate or follow behind the ambulance to the hospital. Are vocational classes available? Yes. Numerous classes are available through the Inmate Services Division and INROADS. If so, what types? GED, Bakery, Auto Repair, Behavioral, Parenting, Culinary Is there a program to involve community volunteers? No DISCIPLINE OF INMATES How often is discipline enacted? As incidents require action. What is the range of discipline options? 2 to 30 days restricted activity. GRIEVANCES What are the most common types of grievances filled by inmates? Accusations against other inmates and requesting things Is there a record kept based on type and number? Yes TELEPHONE Do inmates have access to telephones and how often? Yes. Telephones are available in each dayroom area. They are available during regular dayroom hours. Inmates are allowed to make collect or prepaid phone calls utilizing their individual pin numbers. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 76 CORRESPONDENCE Is there a limited free postage for inmates without money? Inmates without funds are allowed two postage paid envelopes per week from a welfare bag. Are inmates aware that incoming and outgoing mail can be read? Yes. The Inmate Rules and Regulations Pamphlet states that mail is “subject to being scanned, read and inspected.” How are Confidential correspondences to attorneys, legislators, CSA, etc., handled? Legal mail is inspected for contraband, but not read. Outgoing mail is sealed by the inmate after the inspection. Incoming legal mail is opened by the inmate in front of a deputy sheriff and inspected. VISITING Is there adequate space, convenient times or accommodations to family’s work schedule, etc.? Yes. Visiting is held 5 days a week (not Monday or Tuesday) and the last visit is 7:20 PM. Are there provisions for special visits with attorneys/clergy? Yes. They must be cleared through Inmate services and can be allowed to visit at separate times. Does staff supervise visits? Yes. Do all inmates have access to visiting? Yes. If not, give reason: When an inmate is on discipline, he or she cannot receive visits. The average discipline is 2 to 3 days, but maximum (which is rare) can be up to 30 days. An inmate on discipline can receive official visits. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS College level/high school/other: General Education Diploma Name of school district providing educational services: California State University at San Bernardino and Chaffey College. Teachers – number of full-time, number of substitutes: There are 6 full time teachers, 1 on call substitute and 8 interns. Number of inmates in educational program: Monthly average 180 males and 63 females. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 77 Are activities, course work and home work assigned by teachers? Home work is given and required each day. There are also individual and group assignments. Relationship between educational program staff and facility staff: Excellent. The inmates trust the teachers. The teachers enjoy being a mentor. Atmosphere of classroom: Comfortable Are these adequate supplies (books, paper, computers, etc.)? Yes JUVENILES – Not Applicable CONDITIONS OF SECURE DETENTION OUTSIDE A LOCKED ENCLOSURE (e.g., CUFFING RAIL) – Not Applicable CONDITIONS OF NON-SECURE DETENTION – Not Applicable POLICIES AND OPERATIONS MANUALS Inmate Grievances: 16 (see page 11) Citizen Complaints: Zero Major Incidents: Zero Table of Contents of the Manual(s): Have copies of Emergency Operations Manual and Detention and Corrections Bureau Policy and Procedures 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 78 DOCUMENT REVIEW - INMATE GRIEVANCES/COMPLAINTS: TYPES RESOLUTIONS Miscalculated release date Audit completed on booking jacket. All calculations correct. Cancelled visit Unfounded - inmates switching ID cards to obtain visits. Visits reinstated after investigation. Undelivered magazine Magazine determined to be acceptable. Delivered to inmate. Accusation of being involved in an assault. Inmate was a victim of assault. Inmate not treated for pre-existing hernia. Inmate was referred for treatment Inmate did not receive a Satanic Bible Satanic Bible provided to inmate. Inmate requesting early release. Inmate not eligible for early release due to criminal history. Accusations of stolen property after booking. Property was in a vehicle that was impounded upon arrest. He was advised how to get his property out of the tow yard. Charged for medical co-pay but not seen by Money was refunded. medical staff. Inmate requesting a Bible although the library ISU was able to find an extra Bible and gave is closed. it to the inmate. Inmate was unable to finish personal phone Inmate out in excess of Title 15 regulations. call when deputy sheriff closed the dayroom. Inmate requested to withdraw the grievance. Inmate moved from minimum to maximum Inmate classification changed after a housing unit. discipline. Missing food from diet tray. Culinary staff advised. Inmate advised to immediately notify staff if the issue continues. Improperly adjusted release date. Credits recalculated. Not enrolled in INROADS Classes Classes were filled and inmates with earlier release dates were enrolled first. Did not receive library book. Unfounded - library being updated. Total Complaints reviewed: 16 MAJOR INCIDENTS TYPES RESOLUTIONS None Total Complaints reviewed: Zero 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 79 COMMENTS AND CONCERNS OBSERVED DURING THE TOUR: Start tracking the success of the INROADS onsite training following release of the inmates. No booking is done onsite; booking is conducted at West Valley Detention Center. Sentenced inmates from State facilities roll their bedding up during the day. Shower areas throughout the facility need painting. Glen Helen North – San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department/San Bernardino County Fire Department partnership program has a capacity of 96, currently has 45 inmates. This activity has just been implemented; it bears a lot of potential and needs to be watched in the future. Female inmates handle the inmate visitation request call center for all county detention centers. The 1:120 ratio between staff and inmates is problematic. AB109 QUESTIONS (Early release from state facilities to county facilities due to realignment policies) How has AB109 impacted the overall operating of this facility? (i.e. staff, workload, security, operating procedures, and training) Special diet requests, grievances and sick call all increased. Have the facility operating costs changed since implementing AB109? If so, have funds been available to cover these expenses? Funds are tight, and staffing with additional Sheriffs are the major concerns. Explain the procedure for determining how inmates are selected for early release? All the early releases are done through the Classification Population Management Unit (CCU). Every Monday a list of sentenced inmates is compiled by SBSD Technical Services Unit. The number of days varies depending on the number of inmates that need to be released to bring the inmate population under the population cap for all Type II facilities. The inmate lists are given to all Type II facilities and all the inmates booking jackets are reviewed. The inmates must be at or under the designated days determined by CCU. The inmate’s current charges, criminal history and past convictions are checked to see if they 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 80 meet the early release criteria (see release criteria). The lists with all the inmates who qualify for early release are sent to the Lieutenant at CCU and he determines how many inmates need to be released that week and how many days early. The early release orders are sent out on Thursday so the inmates will be out of custody for the weekend. Under CCU there are six full time release officers who work seven days a week. Before the inmate is arraigned, they review all inmates booked for specific charges, review their criminal histories and conduct an interview with the inmates. If they determine an inmate is safe for release, they release the inmate on his/her Own Recognizance (OR) with a date to appear in court. In 2013 they released 5,736 inmates and as of the Grand Jury’s visit in August 2014, they have released 3,660 inmates early. SBSD is also preparing to OR Post Arraignment inmates with the cooperation of the courts, District Attorney and Public Defenders’ Office once the system for OR is in place. Is there anything else you would like the Grand Jury to know about AB109 and the impact it has had on your facility? The Sheriff to inmate ratio is a concern, which requires additional funding. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 81 * * * INSPECTION FORM * * * Please fill out those sections that apply to the facility you are inspecting FACILITY NAME: INSPECTION DATE: California Institution for Men September 23, 2014 FACILITY CAPACITY: LAST BOARD OF STATE & COMMUNITY 4,530 - FULL CORRECTIONS INSPECTION DATE: Not provided ADDRESS: Telephone Number: (909)606-7068 14901 Central Avenue Fax Number: (909)393-8699 Chino, CA 91710 TYPE OF FACILITY: Type III (Convicted or Sentenced Inmates) DETENTION CENTER: Four individual units OTHER: Date Built 1941 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 82 SITE TOUR -AREA INSPECTED/REVIEWED - (Please Check Areas Seen) QUALITY OF LIFE PROGRAMS PERSONS INTERVIEWED Physical Plan X Educational X Inmates X Meals/Nutrition X Vocational X Facility Manager Mental Health X Community Services Medical Physical/Dental Health Domestic Violence School Staff Religious Services Victim/Gang Awareness Mental Health Staff Visiting X Substance Abuse X Line Staff X Volunteer Involvement Other Food Services Staff X ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/NOTES Four individual units at this location All areas are deteriorating Large areas of vacant land which could be used for farming In the Kitchen of Area D, bulk flour was stored by the door on a pallet that should be at least 12 inches off the floor Inmates are transported to Montclair Bus Station upon release GENERAL INFORMATION What is the capacity of the facility? 4,530 What is the current number of pretrial inmates? Zero What is the current number of sentenced inmates? 4,530 Has the facility exceeded capacity since last year’s inspection? No What is the average length of detention? 1 year to life What is the inmate classification system? 1 – 4. Describe: Inmates are classified in four categories: 1 being the lowest to 4 being the highest. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 83 Number of weekend offenders? Zero Number of inmate suicides in the last year? One Number of attempted suicides in the last year? Not provided Number of deaths from other causes in the last year? Natural causes, 6 inmates in 2014 Number of escapes in the last year? None Date of last fire/emergency drill? One every quarter INDIVIDUAL CELLS/ROOM - Overall poor but livable Condition of walls? Peeling paint, bare walls Personal possessions allowed and stored in cell/room (Art, Books, Etc.)? Yes, cluttered Graffiti present? None observed Ample bedding? Yes, old cloth-covered mattresses LOCAL INSPECTIONS Fire Inspection Conducted: Yes - Quarterly Medical/Mental Health: Information not provided Environmental Health: Information not provided Nutritional Health: Information not provided Correction Standards Authority: Information not provided STAFFING What is the staff to inmate ratio? 1 to 150 Does staff communicate in language that an inmate can understand? Yes Diversity and gender of staff? Male and female with diverse ethnicity Impression of staff/inmate interactions? Matter of fact, routine CONDITION OF THE GROUNDS Lawns, exercise area and equipment, asphalt, other: Most lawns were dead, exercise area and equipment old. Asphalt appears to be deteriorated and very old. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 84 EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS General Condition: paint, roof, drains, gutters, other: General condition was little or no signs of maintenance, paint peeling, roof shingles were old and well worn, many broken windows. Exposed metal is rusted. Safety and security issues including fencing, outdoor lighting: Fencing at Area A was around 14 feet high which terminated at the exterior of a one story building wall. In some sections of Area D, lighting did not exist. INTERIOR OF BUILDINGS Walls, paint, floors, drains, plumbing fixtures working, air vents, windows, other: Bare walls (lathe and plaster) exposed, paint peeling; Interior windows broken by staff to administer teargas, floor tiles missing. Dirty and musty throughout. Condition of the interior of the building noting graffiti, peeling paint, unpleasant odors, or other signs of deterioration? Unpleasant odors and signs of deterioration rampant. General cleanliness of the facility including windows, lighting, lockers, desks, conditions of the mattresses, bedding and pillows? Old cloth-covered mattresses appeared well-used and dirty. Condition of sleeping room door panels? Paint peeling, and rusty. If a court holding area is present in the facility, ensure access to toilet and drinking water? Not Applicable Are cleaning fluids and chemicals labeled and safely stored? Yes Is the Material Safety Data Sheet available? Yes Is a Weapons Locker present? None seen, sworn officers are unarmed. They carry a teargas canister. Recreation/sports equipment? Yes, baseball, basketball, and exercise equipment. Are the hallways clear? Yes. Are the doors secured? Yes. No doors were propped open; all were closed. Holding areas (cells/rooms): Those in the halls have no access to drinking water or toilet. Are there individual cells/rooms, or dormitories? All three types exist. Beds – Type of bed and is it off the floor? All observed beds were off the floor. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 85 Adequate lighting? Lighting varied from building to building. Adequate temperature? 85 degrees with no air conditioning - fans were used throughout the buildings. ORIENTATION OF INMATES Are inmates oriented to rules and procedures? Yes Are rules and grievance procedures posted? Yes Are there procedures for handling citizen and inmate complaints? Yes, the tracking of which was not documented. Are rules and grievance procedures understood by inmates? Yes Inmates interviewed? No Number interviewed: Zero Comments: None MEALS/NUTRITION Is the kitchen area clean? Yes, puddles of water from cleaning were on the floor Are knives and chemicals secured? Yes Have the inmates working in the kitchen been trained? Yes Have the inmates had a medical clearance/review before assignment? Yes Are meals served in the cell, dayroom or at a central cafeteria? Served in a central cafeteria Are inmates permitted to converse during meals? Yes Length of time allowed for eating? 15 minutes PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF INMATES What is the appearance of inmates (dirty, unkempt, well-groomed, etc.)? Clean Is the inmate’s appearance well-groomed? Yes Showers – frequency, privacy, maintained, supervised by staff? Daily and supervised Is facial hair allowed? Yes Are there any reported assaults by inmates on inmates? Yes, stated to be a routine activity. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 86 Condition of clothing (does the clothing fit; is it appropriate for the weather, etc.)? The clothing is clean and weather appropriate. PROGRAMS Is exercise inside or out? Inside and outside How frequently is exercise offered? Daily How much exercise time is each inmate offered? One hour per day Do men get more exercise time that the women? No, there are no women inmates at this facility. Are there clergy available to inmates upon request? Yes Can a request for clergy be made for emergency reasons? Yes Are there religious services? Yes What faiths? All major faiths Are anger management and other applicable programs available? Yes What type of onsite health facility is available to inmates? All types Are medical services available? Yes How frequently is medical staff onsite? 24 hours / 7 days a week How long do inmates wait to be seen? 16 hours maximum Is a physician available by phone or on call? Yes What off-site hospital is used for serious health issues? Chino Valley Medical Center Are mental health services available? Yes How frequently is mental health staff onsite? 24/7 How long do inmates wait to be seen? 16 hours maximum What type of on-site dental facility is available to inmates? Fully staffed 5 days a week How are inmates transported to off-site facilities? Shackled with an armed sworn officer, in a van or car. How is security handled for off-site visits? Shackled with an armed sworn officer, in a van of car. Are vocational classes available? Yes. If so, what types? Hard-hat diving, welding, masonry, landscaping, janitorial, General Education Diploma. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 87 Is there a program to involve community volunteers? Yes DISCIPLINE OF INMATES How often is discipline enacted? As needed What are the most common types of grievances filled by inmates? Fights and theft Is there a record kept based on type and number? No records were presented or reviewed. TELEPHONE Do inmates have access to telephones and how often? The availability of phones is determined by the classification. Level One has access in their facility. CORRESPONDENCE Is there limited free postage for inmates without money? Yes Are inmates aware that incoming and outgoing mail can be read? Yes How are confidential correspondences to attorneys, legislators, CSA, etc., handled? The sealing of envelopes is witnessed by a sworn officer. VISITING Is there adequate space, convenient times or accommodations to family’s work schedule, etc.? Yes Are there provisions for special visits with attorneys/clergy? Yes Does staff supervise visits? Yes Do all inmates have access to visiting? Yes If not, give reason: Not Applicable EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS College level/high school/other: General Education Diploma Name of school district providing educational services: Information not provided Teachers – number of full-time, number of substitutes: Information not provided Number of inmates in educational program: Not provided 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 88 Are activities, course work and home work assigned by teachers? Yes Relationship between educational program staff and facility staff: Good Atmosphere of classroom: The classrooms are the most comfortable location in the facility Are these adequate supplies (books, paper, computers, etc.)? Yes Temperature of living units and classroom? 80 degrees JUVENILES - Not Applicable CONDITIONS OF SECURE DETENTION OUTSIDE A LOCKED ENCLOSURE (e.g., CUFFING RAIL) - Not Applicable CONDITIONS OF NON-SECURE DETENTION – Not Applicable POLICIES AND OPERATIONS MANUALS Inmate Grievances: Nothing provided: the four sections resolve their own grievances. Nothing is tracked. Citizen Complaints: Nothing provided, unable to determine due to various staff members receiving complaints and resolving them. Major Incidents: 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS OF THE MANUAL(S) - Copies of Operational Procedure and Department Operations Manual Supplements. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 89 DOCUMENT REVIEW INMATE GRIEVANCES/COMPLAINTS: TYPES RESOLUTIONS None Provided Total Complaints reviewed: Zero MAJOR INCIDENTS TYPES RESOLUTIONS Force or violence racial riot – 9 Blacks and Broke up the riot with pepper spray and 11 Whites grenades, decontamination and rehoused Death in custody - natural causes From 2012 to 2014 the total is 7 Death in custody - suicide by hanging One Total Complaints reviewed: 9 COMMENTS AND CONCERNS OBSERVED DURING THE TOUR This facility is an outdated, over-used and under-maintained facility. The staff to inmate ratio of 1 staff to 150 inmates seems problematic. AB109 QUESTIONS Have the facility operating costs changed since implementing AB109? If so, have funds been available to cover these expenses? No maintenance funds are available. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Detention Centers 90 DEVORE ANIMAL SHELTER
Commendations 2
-
CM1 Page 104The Devore Animal Shelter staff is commended for encouraging the assistance of outside groups and organizations in locating permanent homes for their animals and for utilizing ARFF, as a means to enhance revenue. 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Devore Animal Shelter 96 REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER WEBSITES
-
CM2 Page 114Fontana Police Department Commendation to Fontana Police Department for providing personnel and financial resources to maintain the Offender Watch program to ensure that the information is current and accessible to the public. Responding Agency Recommendation Due Date San Bernardino Police Department 15-14 10/01/2015 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Registered Sex Offender Websites 106 SAN BERNARDINO CITY ANIMAL SHELTER