📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Madera County Grand Jury
• 2021-2022
Madera County Juvenile Detention Center
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 10 findings
F1
Page 33
The MCGJ finds the Correctional Academy Program to besuccessful for the positive development of the youth who take part in the Academy.
F2
Page 33
The MCGJ finds the staff and teachers within the Program at MCJDC highly capable, dedicated, and compassionate.
F3
Page 33
The MCGJ finds that a delay of a 96-hour physical screening endangers the health of other residents and staff.
F4
Page 33
The MCGJ finds the wards face alack of choices after release.
F5
Page 43
The MCGJ finds that there continues to beunmet transit needs throughout the county which will only increase in outlying areas as the population increases and ages.
F6
Page 43
The MCGJ finds that MCC LaVina, Fairmead, Berenda, Madera Dial a Ride, Chowchilla Dial a Ride, Senior Bus and Medical Escort are underused.
F7
Page 43
The MCGJ finds that when referencing the hours and the bus schedules, transit services do not provide adequate hours or diverse route schedules.
F8
Page 43
The MCGJ finds that there are several volunteer unfilled positions on the SSTAC committee. This limits the input from the underserved populations in the community.
F9
Page 43
The MCGJ commends the County on the consolidated contract agreement and, cost savings of $500,000 per year over five years with the selection of FCEOC as the bus service provider under a single operator contract.
F10
Page 43
The MCGJ finds that little is being done to market public transportation within the County.
Recommendations 10
-
R1Page 33The MCGJ commends CAP as a successful program and recommends that the MCJDC continue to provide this highly structured program thus enabling youth to recognize their personal potential.
-
R2Page 33The MCGJ commends the staff and teachers within the Program for their attention to the mental, physical,and educational needs of the youth and encourage providers to continue in their positive responsiveness.
-
R3Page 33The MCGJ recommends that immediately upon admission wards shall be screened for any communicable diseases.
-
R4Page 33The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, the MCJDC connect wards with meaningful community service organizations. 23 24 25 VALLEY STATE PRISON (VSP) SUMMARY: The Madera County Grand Jury visited the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), located in Chowchilla, California on December 6, 2019. The MCGJ toured the prison facility and was provided guided access to manyareas. OVERVIEW: TheVSP is operated by the CDCR. The prison opened in April 1995 as a women-only prison, and the prison began receiving inmates immediately thereafter. The CDCR began converting the prison into a facility for low-risk male inmates in 2012. The conversion was completed in January 2013 with the last female inmates in the facility transferred to the nearby Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF)in Chowchilla and California Institution for Women in Chino, California.Some inmates nearing the end of their sentence were transferred to various county jails. The MCGJ inspected the prison using a checklist developed for grand jury prison inspections bythe California Board of State and Community Corrections. Additional information was requestedby the MCGJprior tomaking the inspection. The check list included the general safety and security of the facility, food services, medical services, job training,and educational programs for inmates, and a housing unit.
-
R5Page 44The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, an incentive programs, including FREE ridership days once a month for Seniors, Disabled and Persons with Limited Means, be introduced.
-
R6Page 44The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, theSenior Bus, Dial-a- Ride, and Medical Transport County service be reviewed and expanded within Eastern Madera County, LaVina, Fairmead, and Berenda.
-
R7Page 44The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, additional bus routes be added for Fairmead, LaVina, Berenda, Raymond, North Fork, and Eastern Madera County.
-
R8Page 44The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, a concerted effort be made by SSTAC to recruit volunteers to serveon the SSTAC committee.
-
R9Page 44The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, the annual $500,000 savings be utilized to increase transit service routes in outlying areas; Eastern Madera County, La Vina, Fairmead, Berenda, Raymond, and North Fork.
-
R10Page 44The MCGJ recommends that, by the beginning of fiscal year 21-22, theCounty Public Works Department proactively seek additional funding, either through grants or minimal fare increases, to brand themselves and actively market their services to improve community outreach and increase ridership. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 1920-03 At Promise Student Opportunities In Madera County SUMMARY: The Madera County Grand Jury (MCGJ) investigated programs and facilities which support “At- Risk” youth. The essential question the MCGJ considered is, what does the education system within the County of Madera do with ‘at-risk youth’ to prevent them from becoming adults with similar problems? What preventative educational programs and training do the districts within Madera County provide to school-aged students who need additional help to prepare to navigate the adult world. The base concern being students becoming homeless or incarcerated adults. The MCGJ reviewed each school district throughout Madera County and how their programs fit to serve the needs of the student. The first problem the MCGJ encountered was a misunderstanding in terminology. At the outset of the investigation, the MCGJ was referring to the student population under consideration as “At-Risk Youth.” The term “at-risk” had been used to describe students coming from precarious situations or circumstances that increase their chances of academic failure. The term was often used to refer to those from disadvantaged backgrounds, which can include those in low-income communities, English learners, and children in foster care, among others. However, the MCGJ was quickly and politely corrected that the current term is “At-Promise Youth.” In October of 2019, the California Governor, through Assembly Bill No. 413, officially changed the term from “At-Risk Youth” to “At-Promise Youth.” The reasoning behind this name change was to create a more positive, “promising” image of students. BACKGROUND: Dr. David Satcher, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated, If you can give young people a reason to believe that they can change their future, then it is much easier to deal with violence and substance abuse and teenage pregnancy…” According to Dr. Satcher, violence, substance abuse, and teenage pregnancy are not the problem but the symptoms of a lack of hope in the future, when young people don’t have any hope for the future, they’ll do anything. For students who are at-promise, their key to success in high school lies in convincing them that a satisfying futureis within their reach by showing them how education relates to their future goals. For the mainstream student in any school, the valued outcome from the school’s perspective is to have as many students graduate as possible and to go on to college. However, for many of the students, their immediate concern is to make money. Students may not want to pursue an academic college education but may wish to pursue a career technical education. Those who do not expect to attend college, however, are often confused as to why they should care about getting a good grade in English, or even finishing high school at all. Students focused on making money have limited their concerns to skill oriented education. Student who don’t see a connection between high school and future success are doomed to spend their school years in a ‘neutral position.’ The way to turn on turned-off students is to help them 62 understand the role of high school achievement in reaching their goals in life as well as in education and employment. In the wake of significant concern and frustration surrounding current public-school systems, forms of alternative education continue to thrive. Many parents are dissatisfied with the quality and focus of the education their children receive in the public-school system. Others may have religious or political reasons to seek alternative schools. Others simply believe their students are unsafe in the public-school system and seek out alternative, nontraditional schools. Students themselves may find that the traditional forms of teaching and learning do not fit their needs. Types of Non-traditional Schools: The Education Code, sections 58500-58512, provides that school districts may establish and maintain alternative schools and programs of choice. The premise behind alternative schools of choice is that “one size doesn’t fit all.” In other words, not all students will thrive or reach their full potential in the traditional comprehensive school. The following is a list of the different types of alternative educational programs available throughout California including Madera County. Alternative-Non-traditional Schools: a form of alternative education with non-traditional methods. Non-traditional schools base their curriculum and methods on individual philosophies of education. Non-traditional schools often teach in radically different manners, sometimes not using grades, or typical teaching strategies such as lesson plans, rubrics, worksheets, and standard type tests. The purpose of alternative schools and programs of choice is to provide different means of achieving grade-level standards and meeting students' needs. Alternative Schools and Programs of Choice are voluntary for districts, teachers, students, and their parents/guardians/caregivers. These schools and programs are often characterized by responsiveness to learning and instructional style differences and small unit size. The effective use of such instructional strategies as independent study, community-based education, focused or thematic education, and flexible scheduling increases attendance and improves performance. Independent Schools: a form of alternative education, often referred to as “independent” schools, are often more traditional in their methods. Students often work at their own pace with standard curriculum and teacher resources. Often times, independent schools provided students an opportunity to catch up on missing credits. Charter Schools: a form of alternative education which is publicly funded but have more freedom and choice in policies and curriculum. In return for academic freedom, charter schools are required to produce better results than the public-school system. Continuation High Schools: Continuation high school is primarily for students who are considered at risk for not graduating at the normal pace. Continuation education provides a high school diploma program that meets the needs of students of ages 16 to 18 who have not graduated from high school, are not exempt from compulsory school attendance, and are deemed at risk of not completing their education. Students enrolled in continuation education programs 63 often are behind in high school credits. They may need a flexible educational environment because they are employed or fulfilling family obligations. Minimum attendance in the program is 15 hours per week or 180 minutes daily. Community Day Schools: Community day schools are schools for students who have been expelled from school or who have had problems with attendance or behavior. They are run by school districts. These schools serve troubled students in many ways. They offer challenging classes and teach important skills. They have counselors and other professionals who assist students. The California Department of Education is involved in the funding and management of community day schools.