Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
County of Mendocino [email protected] Grand Jury Post Office Box 629
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2, F3, F4, F12, F16, F17, F34
Findings and Recommendations 42 findings
F1
Any United States citizen, who is a resident of California, at least 18 years of age and not in prison or on parole for conviction of a felony, may register to vote. A registered voter, also known as an elector, must be a resident of an election precinct at least 15 days prior to an election in order to vote in a given precinct. (Elections Code EC §321) 2. Under the Elections Code, residence for voting purposes means a person’s domicile. The statute explains that ‘domicile’ means: ...that place in which his or her habitation is fixed, wherein the person has the intention of remaining, and to which, whenever he or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given time, a person may have only one domicile. EC§349 3. If a person has more than one residence, the person must choose which will be the designated domicile. If a party has two residences, that will be esteemed his domicile which he himself selects or deems to be his home, or which appears to be the center of his affairs. Chambers v. Hathaway (1921) 187 Cal. 104, 105 4. Election Code §2031 sets up two rebuttable presumptions in determining domicile: your domicile is where you have a homeowner’s exemption and the principal address on your driver’s license. However, a domicile need not be an ordinary living space, but must have a fixed location. It could be a street corner, a boat, a truck, or under a bridge; homeless people do not lose their citizenship rights.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
A person may register by mail. Registration forms are available at county libraries, post offices, city halls, offices of Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Department of Social Services, and on the internet at Secretary of State’s website. There is also a Federal form available that is accepted by all states.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Since January 1, 2006, as required by HAVA, the Registrar validates new registrations by running the registrant’s information through a statewide database. Registrations prior to January 1, 2006 are not checked through the database so long as they continue to vote in general elections.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
After you register, your identity and current domicile address will be confirmed and the information entered into the statewide voter database. To verify identity you must supply a driver’s license/California ID number or the last four digits of your Social Security number. If you do not have the above, you will be issued a unique voter identification number by the State valid only for voting. If your documents do not have your current domicile address, you may be 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report required to provide additional proof of residency such as a homeowner’s tax exemption or file a sworn affidavit.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Since January 1, 2006 there is also an ongoing updating of records for all voters. The Registrar’s Office gets notice from: • DMV if voter submits change of address; • Registrars if voter registers elsewhere in California; • County Public Health Dept and State Health and Human Services of deaths; • Post Office if sample or absentee ballots are returned undeliverable.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
All of these notices are run against the voter registration lists to keep them current.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The Registrar’s Office under certain circumstances will either cancel or inactivate a registration: • If a voter notifies the Registrar that they are moving out of county, the Mendocino County registration is cancelled. • If the Registrar receives notice of new registration in another county or out of state, this County’s registration is cancelled. • If the Registrar receives indirect notice from another agency that voter moved, the registration will be inactivated. • If the voter remains inactive for two (2) federal general elections, the registration will be cancelled.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
At the time of registration, voters may specify a political party affiliation or decline to state any affiliation. In the 2008 presidential primary, voters who had not registered with one of the six qualified parties (Democratic, Republican, American Independent, Green, Libertarian, Peace and Freedom) were allowed to request a ballot to vote in the party primary of either the Democratic Party or American Independent Party, as those two parties had rules allowing party affiliation on Election Day. Otherwise, unaffiliated voters could vote only on the State ballot propositions. Who Can Hold Office? 12. Elected Offices: A candidate’s application must state their residence address, which is verified through the county clerk’s office as their domicile. A candidate must be a registered voter in the district for which they are running. In some cases, there is a residency requirement greater than the 15-day minimum to register in a given precinct. For example, a candidate for County Supervisor must reside in the precinct for 30 days prior to filing the application for candidacy.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
There are candidate filing requirements aside from residency specific to each office. The Registrar’s office prepares a candidate’s handbook for each election with all of the requirements.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
Appointed Offices: The appointing power determines the requirements for office. Generally, appointed officeholders with discretionary authority must be residents of the district in which they serve. Residency requirements are less common for appointees who serve only in a consulting or advisory capacity.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
If, after election or appointment, an official moves their domicile out of the representation area, Government Code §1770 specifies that the office shall be considered vacant. 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report 16. In the case of elected school officials, Education Code §5091(a) provides that whenever a vacancy occurs whether by resignation, or by the official leaving the district, the district’s governing board must within 60 days of the vacancy order an election or make a provisional appointment to fill the vacancy. Voting: Who, Where, When, and How 17. Vote-by-Mail: Historically Absentee Ballots were reserved for voters who were unable to get to their precinct polling place on Election Day. In 2007, AB1243 officially changed the name “Absentee Ballot” to “Vote-by-Mail Ballot.” Increasingly, voters are encouraged to vote by mail rather than in person.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
Page 1
The CEO’s Office agreed that “…The Clerk of the Board processes and authorizes all BOS reimbursement claims and forwards them to the Auditor’s Office for payment.” The BOS agreed that “…the COB processes claims for reimbursement and forwards them to the Auditor’s Office,” but noted that “…The Auditor however, exercises authority for final approval of all reimbursement claims pursuant to adopted policies.” Regarding
No recommendations for this finding
F19
Page 1
The CEO’s Office agreed that “…The Clerk of the Board is directly subordinate to the BOS and is an at-will employee. This is the only case in 4 The report and responses are published on the Grand Jury website www.co.mendocino.ca.us/grandjury 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report the County where a subordinate is vested with the power to authorize personal expenses submitted by a superior.” The BOS response “…agrees with this Finding to the extent that the Clerk is directly subordinate to the BOS and is an at-will employee.” However, the BOS response states that “…the Clerk does not have the vested authority to authorize personal expenses of individual board members. The authority to authorize expenses is the responsibility of the Auditor.” 5. The BOS and (former) CEO both agreed to implement 2006
No recommendations for this finding
F20
To vote by mail, you must apply to your county elections office for a Vote-by-Mail Ballot at least seven days before Election Day. You can use the form on the Sample Ballot booklet you receive in the mail or send your request in writing to your county elections office. If you reside in a designated Vote-by-Mail precinct you automatically receive your ballot by mail.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Currently in Mendocino County 34,074 of 46,102 (74%) of the registered voters are Vote-by- Mail. This is consistent with the statewide trend to Vote-by-Mail especially in rural counties. The counties of Alpine and Sierra in California, have switched 100 percent of their voters to mail-in ballots. The state of Oregon has been using only mail-in ballots since 1998.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
After processing your Vote-by-Mail application, the proper ballot type will be sent to you. You mark your choices on the ballot, put it into the official envelope provided and seal it. Place the proper postage on the envelope and sign the outside of the envelope where directed.
No recommendations for this finding
F23
You may return the Vote-by-Mail ballot by: • mailing through U.S. Postal Service to the Mendocino County Elections office; • delivering in person to elections office within your county; or on election day to any polling place. • authorizing an allowable third party to deliver the ballot to any polling place within the County or to the County Elections Office. The authorized third party may be your spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, or a person residing in the same household as you. Your authorization must be in writing and signed by you.
No recommendations for this finding
F24
Voting in Person: Upon entry to the polling place, the voter’s name is checked against the precinct’s rolls and the voter signs the list.
No recommendations for this finding
F25
If the voter requires assistance, EC §14282(a) requires that the voter may, upon arrival at a polling place, make a sworn statement that they are unable to mark the ballot without 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report assistance. Election officials will then allow the voter to designate up to two persons to assist them in voting. The designated assistants may not be the voter’s employer or agent of the employer nor an officer or agent of the union of which the voter is a member.
No recommendations for this finding
F26
If the polling place is inaccessible to a physically handicapped voter, EC §14282(c) provides that, the voter may vote in an accessible location as near as possible to the polling place. A precinct board member shall take a regular ballot to that person, qualify that person to vote, and return the voted ballot to the polling place.
No recommendations for this finding
F27
Mendocino County still uses paper ballots. Electronic machines are available for use by disabled voters or others upon request. Every polling place has a voting machine.
No recommendations for this finding
F28
On Election Day, if the voter is in line before the polls close, they have the right to cast their ballot.
No recommendations for this finding
F29
The voter who makes a mistake or spoils their ballot, has the right prior to casting the ballot to exchange the spoiled ballot for a new one.
No recommendations for this finding
F30
If voter’s name does not appear on the voting rolls, the voter has the right to cast a provisional ballot.
No recommendations for this finding
F31
When a voter checks in at the polling place to cast their ballot, a poll worker may challenge the voter’s eligibility. Only a poll worker can make the challenge--not a poll watcher or voter.
No recommendations for this finding
F32
If challenged, the voter will be allowed to cast their ballot, but the challenge will be noted on the roll, the voter given a provisional ballot which will be placed in a sealed, signed provisional ballot envelope for later review by the Registrar.
No recommendations for this finding
F33
Suspected illegal or fraudulent activity may be reported to any local elections official or to the Secretary of State’s Office. 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Does Every Vote Count? 34. Processing Mail-In Votes: When a completed Vote-by-Mail ballot is received in the County Elections Office, it is date stamped and scanned in using the bar code on the return envelope. The signature on the Vote-by-Mail ballot’s return envelope will be compared to the signature on the voter registration card to determine that it was completed by the authorized voter. To preserve the secrecy of the ballot, after signature has been verified, the ballot is separated from the envelope so that the ballot becomes anonymous.
No recommendations for this finding
F35
The verification process is labor intensive and requires ample space for the election workers and the voting materials. Each step of the verification process is conducted by two employees of the Registrar’s office. At election time, the Registrar borrows County employees from other departments and hires temporary help on an hourly basis to help process ballots.
No recommendations for this finding
F36
While Mendocino County has sufficient staff to process mail-in ballots, the workspace is cramped and the secured storage space is limited.
No recommendations for this finding
F37
Avoidable reasons for disqualification of a Vote-by-Mail ballot: • No Signature: Vote-by-mail ballots that do not have a valid signature on the return envelope are not counted. • Wrong Signature: The signature on the return envelope of vote-by-mail ballots is compared with the signature on file. If the signatures do not match, the ballot will not be counted. If a voter’s signature has changed, the voter may request a new registration form to update their signature. Such update must be completed by the registration deadline for the election. • Delivery without Authorization: If the voter wishes to designate an allowable third party to return the voter’s completed ballot on Election Day, the voter must designate the third party in writing and sign the authorization on the return envelope. Eligible designees are: spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister or person residing in the same household as the voter. Without the proper authorization, the ballot will not be counted. • Delivery after Deadline: Any vote-by-mail ballot, whether submitted by mail or in person, that is received by the elections office or polling place within the county after 8 PM on Election Day will not be counted.
No recommendations for this finding
F38
If a mail-in ballot is rejected because of no signature or signature that doesn’t match the registration, the registered voter is notified by letter and may request a new ballot at least seven days prior to election. The rejected ballot is not opened, but put into a tray which is color coded by precinct.
No recommendations for this finding
F39
Valid ballots are also sorted into trays by precinct. The trays are put into locked storage to await processing through the counting machine. The availability of secure storage for election materials is limited. Counting of mail-in ballots may begin seven days prior to Election Day.
No recommendations for this finding
F40
Registered voters may go on-line to the County Registrar’s website prior to Election Day to check whether their Vote-by-Mail ballot has been received.
No recommendations for this finding
F41
In Mendocino County’s 2008 presidential primary, nearly 18% percent of Vote-by-Mail voters waited until Election Day to turn their ballots in at polling places. Because of the verification process required on mail-in ballots, those received on Election Day are set aside for later processing to allow the tallying of ballots coming in from the precincts.
No recommendations for this finding
F42
Processing on Election Day: After the polls close on Election Day, the Registrar’s Office sends out teams to pick up the ballots and voting machines from each polling place within the County. Some polling places cover more than one precinct. Upon arrival at the Registrar’s 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Office the ballots and electronic machines are checked in, verifying that all ballots issued are accounted for as having been voted, damaged or unused. The voted ballots are grouped by precinct and scanned. The scanning process creates a paper tape record and an electronic record. Any un-scannable ballots are set aside to be processed by hand by at least two election officials. The entire counting process takes place in a secure room with large plate glass windows through which members of the press and the general public may observe. The counting room is crowded with machines, election workers and stacks of ballot boxes.
No recommendations for this finding
F43
After the in-person votes have been tallied, the Elections Office returns to the mail-in votes that remain to be counted. In the 2008 presidential primary, 4,023 of 22,508 (almost one-fifth of the total) mail-in votes were submitted on Election Day.
No recommendations for this finding
F44
Processing of Provisional Ballots: Once the mail-in votes have been processed, the Registrar turns to the provisional ballots. Provisional ballots are issued whenever a voter: • is not on the rolls, • is not at their designated polling place, • is not able to establish their identity.
No recommendations for this finding
F45
In the 2008 presidential primary, the Elections Office received 607 provisional ballots, which had to be processed manually. Of those received, 52 were rejected after review by the Registrar. As in the case of Vote-by-Mail ballots, the voter signature on the provisional ballot envelope is checked against the Registrar’s database to verify the identity and eligibility of the voter before the ballot is opened and counted.
No recommendations for this finding
F46
Certification of the Election Results: The Registrar has a total of 28 days to complete the canvas of all ballots whether cast in person, by mail, or on a provisional ballot. The certified results are filed with the Secretary of State and are published.
No recommendations for this finding
F47
The Registrar’s Office is required to secure and retain all voted ballots for a period of 22 months after a general election, for six months after a local election. The security and retention requirements imposed by the Secretary of State severely reduce the workspace available for the other activities of the Registrar’s Office.
No recommendations for this finding
F48
Enforcement Protections against Fraud: When registering to vote or when filing to be a candidate for office, the party declares under penalty of perjury that the information on the application is true. The Registrar’s office will turn suspected cases of fraud over to the Sheriff, District Attorney’s office, or any other affected agency. The Registrar is not the enforcing authority.
No recommendations for this finding
F49
A private citizen may report suspected illegal or fraudulent activity to any local elections official or to the Secretary of State’s Office and may also pursue it through civil court.
No recommendations for this finding
Comments 41
-
CO1failed to maintain a chronological waiting list of applicants for VHR/SUR licenses, as required by the certified MTP; 1 In conjunction with the LUP certification in November 1996, the CCC granted a Categorical Exclusion Order that exempts single-family homes, water wells and septic systems in mapped areas of Mendocino from the need to obtain a Coastal Development Permit. 2 MTP excerpts that are relevant to licensing of VHR/SUR units are presented in Exhibit I. The timeline for certification of the Mendocino LCP is presented in Exhibit II. 3 See underlined text in Exhibit I Page 39 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CO2denied a Use Permit (required to obtain a VHR license) to at least one applicant on the basis of the CAC recommendations;
-
CO3discouraged other prospective applicants from pursuing a license;
-
CO4continued to distribute copies of the Mendocino Town Plan and Zoning Code that bear incorrect certification dates, and
-
CO5have not yet revised the VHR/SUR Tables prepared in 1992 to correct mapping errors that omitted eight units that were licensed prior to that time. The Tables do not show the corrected baseline number of 53 allowable licenses. On October 2, 2001, the BOS, by order of the Chair, directed the Fifth District Supervisor to “…work with staff and interested members of the CAC, to coordinate the followup action in response to the recommendations presented by the Town of Mendocino CAC.” This appears to have resulted in a de facto VHR/SUR licensing moratorium. The Board of Supervisors (BOS) never formally endorsed a freeze on VHR/SUR licensing, and no LCP amendment application was submitted to seek CCC certification of this change in practice. Limits on visitor-serving facilities were allowed by the CCC to protect the residential character of the Town. It is not possible to estimate the impact of licensed and/or unlicensed VHR/SUR accommodations without a legal and transparent licensing process and mechanisms for enforcement of the licensing requirements. The de facto moratorium on the issuance of VHR/SUR licenses has resulted in a:
-
CO6loss of income to property owners,
-
CO7loss of revenue to the Town,
-
CO8loss of the 10% Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) to the County, and
-
CO9drastic reduction in licensed visitor-serving accommodations that are suitable for families. In February 2008, a County long-range planning team began a review to update the MTP Tables that document the number and location of licensed VHR/SUR units. The BOS has also directed the planning team to establish processes to maintain and monitor this data and to maintain the required chronological waiting lists. Methods The Grand Jury interviewed Mendocino County Supervisors and Planning and Building Services staff and reviewed relevant documents.
-
CO10an application to amend the certified LCP;
-
CO11Coastal Commission certification of the amendment;
-
CO12acceptance of the certified amendment by the BOS; and
-
CO13filing of the certified amendment with the Secretary for Resources.
-
CO14identify factors underlying the District’s decline;
-
CO15document the recovery efforts by the current Intervention Team and the dedicated teachers, staff, school board members, students and other community members. Poverty and widespread abuse of alcohol and illegal drugs in Round Valley undermine family stability and are serious obstacles to the development of the community’s children and youth. Irregular school attendance interferes with learning. Strong leadership was described as the most important factor for improving the quality of the District’s schools. Jurors heard promising reports of improved staff morale and student behavior. A Parent Teacher Organization and other school/community partnerships are beginning to form. Also noteworthy, is the emphasis on expanding the number of ROP classes that engage students in hands-on learning that is directly relevant to their lives and potential future occupations. Page 95 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Repeated site visits made it clear that continued MCOE support and even broader student-focused community involvement will be needed if Round Valley youth are to reach their full potential. Round Valley has experienced many academic peaks and valleys; the challenge is to preserve the impressive but fragile gains that have been made and to achieve a high and sustainable plateau. On an early visit to Round Valley, Jurors learned of a new District-wide policy requiring the removal of hats when students are inside the school. In the short time, since the term had begun, this traditional gesture of respect was surprisingly noticeable…both in the relative uniformity of its enforcement and in the apparent willingness of most students to comply. After years of declining discipline, accountability, morale, and performance, most teachers and many students appeared to recognize the rule as symbolic of positive change. Every journey begins with a single step, and in Round Valley, the “hats off rule” may well prove to be that first critical step toward renewed respect and personal responsibility. Our hats are off to those who are making success a reality in this exceptionally challenging environment. Required Responses: Superintendent, Mendocino County Office of Education (All Findings; All
-
CO16Shelter Cove Community Day School (Grades 6-8; 360 instructional minutes/day)
-
CO17Lighthouse Community Day School (Grades 9-12; 360 instructional minutes/day)
-
CO18Noyo Continuation High School (Ages 16-18; 180 instructional minutes/day) All three schools provide highly structured, individualized instruction and limited support services that emphasize positive student behavior and academic progress toward a high school degree or equivalency certificate. A low student/teacher ratio permits extra support for students whose life experiences and behavior place them at serious risk of academic and/or societal failure. The 2007-08 Grand Jury found facilities and classrooms to be clean, well organized and free of debris or graffiti. Landscape maintenance at the Lighthouse/Noyo site was not at the level observed at the District’s main campuses. Two sports courts, bond-funded four years ago, have yet to be constructed. Campus security remains a concern, particularly in view of documented student behavioral problems, gang affiliations and substance abuse. The staff relies on 911 to summon assistance in the event of an emergency. Exterior video surveillance is planned, but not yet in place. Classrooms are not equipped with interior safety locks, and some rooms lack window coverings that would shield occupants from view in the event of an emergency. Required emergency drills focus on fire and earthquake readiness; lockdown drills have not been a priority. 1 The 2006-07 Report on Lighthouse School and the FBUSD response are posted at: www.co.mendocino.ca.us/grandjury/ Page 99 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report During 2007-08, the alternative schools operated under experienced interim leadership while seeking a new principal. Staff morale was markedly improved compared to the previous year, despite reports that the student population was even more challenging. The challenges and stress of working with these students was mentioned repeatedly as a factor in the high turnover of leadership, teachers and aides. Teaching students with a wide range of academic, behavioral and social issues requires skills that are not routinely taught in regular teacher education programs. The District acknowledges that …the amount of time and training available are inadequate for the demands of the job. 2 The small size and physical isolation of the Fort Bragg programs make it extremely difficult to provide an effective professional support network for both the students and teachers and for staff to access on-going skill development. Methods The Grand Jury reviewed documents, conducted two site visits to the Fort Bragg Alternative Schools and interviewed FBUSD administrators and teachers. Jurors also reviewed documents and conducted a site visit and interviews to understand the alternative school programs provided by the Mendocino County Office of Education (MCOE). Additional interviews were conducted with staff of Juvenile Probation and the County’s Alcohol and Other Drug Programs (AODP).
-
CO19obtained information from the Alliance for Rural Community Health;
-
CO20toured two of the six community health clinics in the County;
-
CO21interviewed executives and staff at the two clinics;
-
CO22reviewed budgets, books and records, inspection reports, audits, and reports made to the State and other Agencies. The Grand Jury also visited the Laytonville Fire Department and reviewed its records and statistics. Jurors interviewed management and staff regarding the ambulance service they provide to LVHC.
-
CO23maintain the privately owned laterals that connect to the public sewers;
-
CO24avoid routing storm water into private laterals or directly into public sewer lines;
-
CO25use the system only to dispose of human waste and related sanitary products;
-
CO26employ composting to dispose of food and plant waste;
-
CO27avoid cleaning products labeled “flushable;” many are not treatable;
-
CO28keep oil and grease, medicines and other chemicals, hair, floss, paper, fabric and all other non-soluble materials out of the sewer system. Page 144 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Human health and environmental risks and economic pressures from regulatory agencies underscore the urgent need for vigilant maintenance and capital improvements to Fort Bragg’s sewer system and treatment plant. Staffing is minimally adequate to meet current needs; any reduction will create added risks of sewer overflows and effluent limitation exceedances. The Public Works Superintendents and staff members responsible for collection and treatment of the City’s wastewater are to be commended for their professionalism and commitment to maintaining systems that are essential to the well-being of all who live, work, or visit in the area they serve.
-
CO29During election season, the Registrar’s Office is a beehive of activity. Through the large plate glass windows, voters, eagerly awaiting election results, can watch the ballots being processed: Page 12 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report checked and double-checked, tallied and re-tallied. The open windows epitomize transparency in government. The careful, competent handling of our votes by all the employees allays concern about the voting process and instills trust in the democratic process.
-
CO30The City of Fort Bragg was not well served by Coastal Commission staff. Prevailing CCC regulations and processes are complex and poorly articulated. This, however, does not excuse the deliberate and persistent application of the uncertified LCP to local development permit applications by the Community Development Department. Jurors found substantial evidence that the Community Development Director failed to keep the City Council accurately informed about the status of the LCP amendment application and that most, if not all, Council Members were unaware that the uncertified LCP was being applied until this was brought to their attention by members of the public in April 2006. After a long and onerous process, the amended LCP now appears to be on its way to effective certification in July 2008, five years after the initial application was submitted. Even now, at least one substantive issue remains unresolved that will require further amendment. The loss of the Hazelwood Townhouses appears irrevocable. The Coastal Commission was established ostensibly to protect the coastal environment, not to preclude human habitation and necessary development. Although periodic review of Local Coastal Programs is required by law, it is effectively precluded by Byzantine rules and a process of implementation that is nothing short of Kafkaesque. Addressing malfunctioning State government entities is beyond the purview of County Grand Juries. We cede this task to our elected officials and to county and local governing bodies throughout the State.
-
CO31Purging of evidence is a tedious job requiring much investigation. With the availability of computers, the Mendocino County District Attorney’s office could furnish the date of final disposition of a case to the Sheriff’s main evidence depository in Ukiah. This change would reduce the time required for investigation by the evidence clerks. The Fort Bragg Sheriff’s substation provides a necessary and valuable service to coastal residents. There are great expectations that the new countywide microwave system will provide reliable communications, especially for coastal law enforcement and other coastal emergency providers.
-
CO32The Mendocino County Jail is not a great place to be, but the facility offers many programs that may make an inmate less likely to return. Especially notable, is the encouragement by staff that inmates utilize the opportunity to achieve academic and life skills. These programs may reduce recidivism. The correctional officers and their staff are maintaining a safe and functional environment for the staff and inmates. The MCJ operates under the same minimal budget as other County departments.
-
CO33If the present escalation of juvenile incarceration continues, as the trends show, the maximum capacity of the facility will soon be exceeded. The Grand Jury is pleased with the condition and maintenance of the facility. The facility is well managed, efficient, clean and sanitary. Youth benefit from the structured schedule and the expectation of cooperation. The staff was found to be caring, and the youth were well groomed.
-
CO34Mendocino County Probation Officers are peace officers. They carry a badge, have handcuffs, may be armed and may make arrests. Mendocino County has a small population which puts limits on DPO specialization. DPOs must cover others’ jobs during vacations, illness, training, etc. Cross training between the Adult and Juvenile Divisions is useful and should be rewarded. The Mission Statement mentions keeping the community safe, but the Department really is attempting to do the following three tasks: (cid:121) keep both the officers and the community safe, (cid:121) keep people out of incarceration—jail, juvenile hall, prison, or the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice, (formerly the California Youth Authority); (cid:121) turn probationers into law abiding citizens. Is the Probation Department achieving its goals? The Grand Jury was unable to answer this question due to a lack of reliable and complete statistics on crime trends and various types of recidivism, including: (cid:121) A person convicted of a crime who later commits and is convicted of another crime. (cid:121) A person convicted of a crime who violates parole or probation. (cid:121) A person who violates parole or probation more than once. (cid:121) A person who is convicted of a crime committed while on probation or parole (cid:121) A person who returns to incarceration. Rookie sheriff’s officers, just out of the academy, may work in tandem with another officer for six months before going out on their own. This procedure is for training and evaluation. One week of shadowing a mentor is an improvement, but does not seem to be an adequate amount of time. The episode with the out-of-warranty bulletproof vests is a major system failure. A system should have been in place to warn of the coming expiration. A stop gap system is now in place, but it falls far short of a failsafe solution. A DPO’s job is often a thankless one. A DPO II earns between $20.81 and $24.94 an hour.1 He or she is sometimes a social worker with a gun; sometimes a jailer with no jail. Usually, no one is happy to see a DPO coming. The Grand Jury recognizes that the information in this report only scratches the surface of the conditions and responsibilities of the Department. Managers and some staff report improvement in morale, while others are still concerned about trust and 1 See http://www.co.mendocino.ca.us/hr/cgi-bin/specs.pl. Page 75 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report communication. The newer staff is reported to be “gung ho.” Despite budgetary difficulties and problems within the Department, the DPOs manage to do their job. The Grand Jury commends the CPO for making a very concerted effort to improve the communications, morale, and working conditions within the Department.
-
CO35These two conservation camps appear to be well managed with dedicated staff. The facilities’ staff is to be commended for maintenance of the facilities and providing positive models for the inmates. To maintain a high degree of firefighting efficiency, the inmates need quality food and state of the art exercise equipment. The vegetable garden is vital to meeting the daily dietary needs of the inmates, and has provided valuable work experience, including the construction and maintenance of the greenhouse and garden areas. Page 80 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report The inmates have the opportunity to improve their skills, while performing valuable services to Mendocino County. In addition, inmate training and educational programs may assist in reducing recidivism. We are most fortunate to have these Camps in this area. The inmates are well-trained and capable of being emergency “First Responders.”
-
CO36The City of Willits Police Department is concerned about the possible loss of all or part of its Federal grant, Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS). Fatigue results when Officers work a 12-hour shift; safety then becomes a concern for both the Officer and the community. As with many local police agencies, newly trained officers often leave the community for higher paying jobs.
-
CO37Working with At Risk adolescents is intrinsically challenging. In alternative schools, teachers must cover a wide range of subjects at varied learning levels while also responding to their students’ serious behavioral issues. This results in an intense working environment and vulnerability to burnout. Gang activity in Fort Bragg has escalated behavioral issues and substance abuse among FBUSD students. FBUSD is to be commended for its early prevention and intervention programs and its community collaboration to control and offset gang influences. Security measures at the alternative school sites would complement these prevention and intervention efforts. Mitigating the risk of burnout is a high priority. The prevailing sense of isolation can be addressed, in part, through professional development and by enhancing the adult presence on the alternative school campuses. Timely completion of the promised sports courts would be one positive step. Another would be for MCOE to establish the recommended learning community for alternative school educators throughout the County, using a combination of face-to-face contact and teleconferencing. District leadership and community involvement, as in the exemplary partnership between Shelter Cove and Big Brothers/Big Sisters, are invaluable to alternative school staff and their students. Page 110 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Jurors were impressed with the skill and dedication of the staff at both MCOE and Fort Bragg alternative schools, and with the observed camaraderie between students and staff. Bilingual, culturally sensitive staff members are particularly important in this setting. Staff morale at Fort Bragg was noticeably improved over last year, underscoring the impact of positive leadership.
-
CO38The Grand Jury found that the LVHC and the MCHC offer a valuable service to the community despite their budgetary and staffing limitations. Recently, the State of California has announced mid-year budget cuts that will further inhibit the clinics’ ability to serve. Ambulance service is a necessary and valuable component of health care emergency response. LVHC is a remote clinic without access to private ambulance service. LVFD readily provides this service even with their budgetary constraints.
-
CO39Some forms of treatment cost more than others in the short term. However, if they are effective in the long term, they will save money over the long haul. Only experimenting with treatment protocols will demonstrate this. But, a change in protocols may threaten some jobs or types of work. The branch’s regular budget largely depends on “billable minutes” to Medi-Cal and others. If clinical staff can bill for 70% of their time, the reimbursement will support the entire branch budget. If Prop. 63 treatment modes work, there is a threat to the branch’s funding. The public wants to help the mentally ill. But it doesn’t want to see them. Any Recovery Model assumes the mentally ill will be among us. That’s part of the treatment. Page 136 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report Funds available for treating those with mental disorders have always been insufficient, and the mental health workers are underpaid relative to the technical skills required of them. People enter this field in spite of these obstacles because the deposit they make into their emotional bank is great.
-
CO40Most of the concerns that surfaced during this inquiry can be attributed to scarce financial resources and deferred maintenance of an aging system. Providing an adequate supply of potable water will be an on-going challenge. End users can anticipate continuing pressure to conserve water. They would be well advised to plan for mandatory rationing during periods of drought. They may also expect periodic rate increases to cover the cost of maintaining and upgrading the system. The Fort Bragg Water Enterprise Treatment and Distribution Superintendents are to be commended for their professionalism and commitment to maintaining systems that are essential to the well-being of all who live, work, or visit in the area they serve. Page 151 of 159 6/30/2008 2007/2008 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CO41Water rights are allocated by SWRCB on a first come first served basis. Because Redwood Valley voted not to invest in the dam that created Lake Mendocino a half century ago, it now has only limited winter pumping rights to water to the Lake’s water and a tenuous claim to the limited supply of “surplus” water from RR and SCWA. Hindsight is 20/20, but the Redwood Valley community must focus on the future. Wells dry up as the water table recedes. “Surplus” water may be expected to decline with further development and increased demand by primary users. Residents cannot depend on “surplus” water, especially in the dry years. Today RVW has limited options: it can use less water, get more, and/or store up to 2,800 af of the 4,900 af that it is entitled to pump during the winter months. These options are clear to see but difficult and costly to achieve. RVW’s situation is made even more difficult by numerous regulatory agencies, often with overlapping or even contradictory rules. The entire Redwood Valley community, dependent on RVW water for its livelihood and for living, must confront the water challenge and work with the Redwood Valley County Water District for solutions that benefit all.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Mendocino County
County