El Dorado Irrigation District Hiring Process

Published: November 07, 2005 2 pages

View Original PDF

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and recommendations have not been extracted yet.

The full report content may still be accessible via the PDF link above.

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

El Dorado Irrigation District Response to Final Report(PDF, 38KB)

November 07, 2005 • 7 pages • 1 response • Score: 0 (+0, 1, 0) View Details ▾

PDF

1 response to findings and recommendations

The Grand Jury concurs with the creation of the Facilities Investment Team as an advisory body for the facilities function.

Response: Disagree Partially Score: 0

F, above. Page 6 of 7 Grand Jury’s Finding 4F: The practice of giving Board of Directors “cash-in- lieu” benefits prior to 07-01-2004 appears to be illegal. District’s Response: The District disagrees in part with this finding, because it draws a conclusion on an unresolved legal issue. The District agrees that the past “cash-in-lieu” practice was legally questionable. The District’s General Counsel so advised Board members and the General Manager in late May 2004. The General Counsel’s advice was one catalyst for discontinuing the prior practice and replacing it with the EWP. Grand Jury’s Rec...