📋
Extraído del Informe Consolidado

Esta investigación fue publicada originalmente como parte de un informe consolidado más amplio que contiene múltiples investigaciones. Consulte el PDF consolidado para ver el documento completo.

Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2023-2024

Civil Grand Jury Final Report 2023 - 2024 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury Final Report

Published: January 04, 2023 24 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 13 findings

F1 Page 23
There is no formal procedure for the evaluation and approval of agricultural Disagrees contracts in Contra Costa County by the DCD.
F2 Page 23
The current process to review and approve an agricultural contract takes over Disagrees three years.
F3 Page 23
An agricultural contract has not been approved since 2018. Agrees Disagrees
F4 Page 23
Delays in approving agricultural contracts require applicants to continue to pay higher property tax payments while awaiting approval.
F5 Page 23
The DCD ePermit online tool provides an overly broad status on agricultural Disagrees contracts. As of April 2023, the status of all agricultural contract applications is “hearing prep." This could indicate the application is under an environmental quality review or being prepared for the board of supervisors for approval.
F6 Page 23
Our interviews found that one planner is trained to work on agricultural Agrees contracts and is often compelled to spend a majority of their time on other tasks such as the general plan.
F7 Page 23
Inquiries for status via email and voicemail by agricultural contract applicants to Disagrees the DCD are often not responded to.
F8 Page 23
When applicant email inquiries are responded to, they often provide a progress Disagrees status that fails to materialize and/or is overly optimistic. Page A1 of 10 Compliance and Continuity Report Table 2 Report # 2302 CCC Department of Conservation & Development. The Long Wait for Agricultural Contract Approval.
F9 Page 31
When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA’s) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 funding for affordable housing.
F10 Page 31
Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 for very low- and low-income residents.
F11 Page 31
Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer’s overall ability to raise funds for 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 an AH development.
F12 Page 31
Cities that proactively engage citizens, address zoning obstacles, make reasonable zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful in attracting AH projects.
F13 Page 31
The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 are expected to be permitted for very low- and low-income housing. Page A9 of 10 SOB CCC hcoitnA doowtnerB notyalC drocnoC ellivnaD otirreC lE selucreH etteyafaL zenitraM agaroM yelkaO adnirO eloniP grubsttiP lliH tnasaelP dnomhciR olbaP naS nomaR naS keerC tunlaW Compliance and Continuity Report Table 10

Recommendations 14