Orange County Grand Jury • 2021-2022 • Agency Response
Response to: Trabuco Canyon Water District

Water in Orange County Needs 'One Voice'.*

Published: August 08, 2022 4 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
Response: TCWD wholly disagrees with this finding. 32003 Dove Canyon Drive, Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679 • 949/858-0277 • Fax: 949/858-3025 www.tcwd.ca.gov TCWD does not agree that a consolidated wholesale water supply entity for Orange County would likely fare better at influencing policy and legislation, and receive more subsidies and grants, at the local, State, and federal levels. Two wholesale entities, with separate key staff and advocates aligned on water management policy for Orange County, are more effective at influencing policy and legislation than one. The same can be said for the pursuit of grants and other outside funding. Strategically, Orange County is better served by its wholesale water agencies coordinating multiple bites of the funding apple in different areas of focus such as water use efficiency, groundwater treatment, and recycled water infrastructure. Indeed, Orange County has a long history of success in securing outside funding for potable and recycled water infrastructure, groundwater recharge and cleanup, stormwater capture, and water use efficiency through cooperative efforts at the wholesale and retail agency level. Finding F2: The current fragmented water system structure and operations provides challenges as it relates to development of new interconnected infrastructure as well as maintenance of existing systems.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Response: TCWD wholly disagrees with this finding. TCWD would characterize the current water system structure in Orange County as functional, rather than fragmented. As it relates to the wholesale water agencies that are the subject of the Grand Jury report, OCWD owns, operates, and maintains water system infrastructure necessary to manage the groundwater basin, while MWDOC purchases imported water from a conveyance system owned, operated, and maintained by Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MET). Retail agencies pump groundwater and/or purchase imported water for delivery through their own infrastructure. Borne out of the different roles each entity fulfills, this reality has not impeded the successful, innovative development over the past several decades of intra-County conveyance facilities, interconnections of local retail systems, emergency supply projects, or maintenance of existing infrastructure despite the inherent challenges of doing so. TCWD does not believe that a single water authority would serve to combine any wholesale-level infrastructure or mitigate the challenges of interconnected infrastructure. Finding F3: There is a great disparity between the North/Central and South Orange County water sources, management, and operations carried out by OCWD and MWDOC.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Response: TCWD is not an Orange County wholesale water agency and is not in a position to implement this recommendation. However, TCWD believes that any future wholesale agency governance should continue to consider the unique needs of all Orange County water agencies that it serves. If you need further information regarding this response, please contact me at (949) 709-5721. Sincerely, -alum. Fernando Paludi, P.E. General Manager TCWD Board of Directors
F3
Response: TCWD agrees with this finding. TCWD agrees that there is a significant disparity inherent in the respective water sources of the North/Central and South regions of Orange County. Groundwater produced from the Orange County Groundwater Basin on average accounts for over 75% of the water supply for water agencies in North and Central Orange County. By contrast, retail water agencies in South Orange County rely nearly 100% on imported water purchased through MWDOC and supplied through MET and local infrastructure. It follows that the water management and operations of OCWD and MWDOC are appropriately different (rather than "disparate") given their distinct roles and responsibilities. Finding F4: South Orange County has many smaller retail water districts that lack a formal centralized leadership. Notwithstanding this lack of structure, South Orange County retail water districts have displayed effective collaboration when dealing with one another.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Response: TCWD agrees with this finding. TCWD agrees that the retail water providers in South Orange County are an example of effective collaboration without the need for centralized leadership or consolidation. Much like the groundwater producers in North/Central County, South County's independent agencies work together on water policy, legislation, and infrastructure through regular and ad hoc forums, yet remain responsive to the unique needs of communities they serve. Finding F5: Orange County Water District is a recognized worldwide leader in groundwater resource management and reclamation. Its leadership, innovation, and expertise can be further utilized to serve all of Orange County in developing additional innovative and beneficial programs.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Response: TCWD partially disagrees with this finding. TCWD agrees that OCWD is a recognized worldwide leader in groundwater resource management and water reuse. In fact, Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) is the world's largest indirect potable reuse project (and getting larger) and OCWD has shown effective leadership in quickly implementing projects to address PFAS contamination in the groundwater basin. OCWD has also closely collaborated with another large agency, Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) on multiple water reuse and groundwater replenishment achievements, from Factory 21 beginning more than 40 years ago, to GWRS today. TCWD believes that OCWD should continue to leverage its expertise and leadership within the groundwater basin, and that all Orange County water agencies should continue to develop innovative and beneficial programs, both independently and through collaboration as appropriate. Finding F6: Orange County currently does not have a countywide coordinated policy regarding water conservation, which results in difficulty when complying with any new State-mandated conservation regulations.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Response: TCWD wholly disagrees with this finding. TCWD does not agree that a countywide conservation policy would facilitate compliance with State-mandated conservation regulations. Conservation policies and programs are best designed and implemented by local retail water agencies to meet local needs because compliance is enforced at the retail agency level rather than the county level. A one-size-fits-all approach to conservation policy would be inefficient and meet resistance at the local level. Retail water agencies need their water wholesaler to provide funding in the form of rebates and incentives to buy down the cost of conservation programs, and policy and technical analyses to navigate ever- changing regulations and mandates. Retail member agencies of MWDOC have been well-served by water use efficiency and conservation compliance support available through core and choice services.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.