Score: +2 (2/0/0)
Ventura County Grand Jury • 2023-2024

2023-2024 Ventura County Grand Jury : Consolidated Final Report

Published: June 11, 2024 76 pages Consolidated Report
Ver PDF original

Findings and Recommendations 17 findings

F01 Page 26
The City of Oxnard is not in compliance with California’s Permit Streamlining Act with regard to mandated timelines for development projects, taking 171 days, on average, between application and entitlement for housing with more than five units.
Related Recommendations (1)
R01
Page 27
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Oxnard identify specific steps that will be taken to reduce turnaround times to comply with California’s Permit Streamlining and ADU Acts and include expected completion dates for those steps by January 1, 2025. (F-01, F-02,
F02 Page 26
The City of Oxnard is not in compliance with the California State ADU Act with regard to the mandated 60 days from application (entitlement) to permitting, taking 406 days, on average.
Related Recommendations (1)
R02
Page 27
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Oxnard identify and recruit potential hires having EnerGov experience in the Planning and Building Divisions of the Community Development Department by January 1, 2025. (F-04)
F03 Page 26
Since 2020, assessed property values adjusted for inflation in the City of Oxnard have not increased. This indicates that city services may be maintained but could be expanded by streamlining the approval process.
Related Recommendations (1)
R03
Page 27
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Oxnard utilize EnerGov personnel, expert consultants and IT personnel of Oxnard to properly configure meaningful reports regarding compliance, workload and timeliness EnerGov reports for the Community Development Department by June 30, 2025. (F-05) Ventura
F04 Page 26
Inadequate staffing, leadership turnover and increased workloads have led to lengthy delays in project approvals for the City of Oxnard.
Related Recommendations (1)
R04
Page 27
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Ventura identify specific steps that will be taken to reduce turnaround times to comply with 12 Building Better Together: Suggestions for Smoother Permitting Processes California’s Permit Streamlining Act and include expected completion dates for those steps by January 1, 2025. (F-06, F-14)
F05 Page 26
Out-dated computer systems have led to lengthy delays in project approvals for the City of Oxnard. Ventura
Related Recommendations (1)
R05
Page 28
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Ventura work with the California Department of Housing and Community Development to correct errors in annual progress reports by January 1, 2025. (F-07)
F06 Page 26
The City of Ventura is in compliance with California’s Permit Streamlining Act for the 30-day requirement to deem Complete or issue an Incomplete Letter, but not for the lead agency approving or disapproving a project with an exempt CEQA status within 60 days.
Related Recommendations (1)
R06
Page 28
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Ventura identify and recruit potential hires having EnerGov experience in the Planning and Building Divisions of the Community Development Department by January 1, 2025. (F-09, F-10)
F07 Page 26
The City of Ventura did not meet the regional housing-needs requirements from its 2014-2021 Housing Element, and little data was available from the annual progress report dashboard.
Related Recommendations (1)
R07
Page 28
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Ventura create a standardized training protocol for new hires and existing employees for the EnerGov software system, including ongoing periodic training, by January 1, 2025. (F-08, F-15)
F08 Page 26
There has been inadequate training for the EnerGov system from deployment to present.
Related Recommendations (1)
R08
Page 28
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Ventura properly configure and put into practice all originally purchased EnerGov modules by January 1, 2025. (F-15, F-16)
F09 Page 26
Inadequate staffing and leadership turnover have led to lengthy delays in project approvals.
Related Recommendations (1)
R09
Page 28
The Grand Jury recommends that the City of Ventura, in conjunction with the IT department and expert consultants, implement and properly configure meaningful reports regarding compliance, workload and timeliness within the EnerGov software system by January 1, 2025. (F-11, F-12, F-16)
F10 Page 26
Departures of experienced individuals have caused a lack of continuity and institutional memory in several Community Development Divisions.
No recommendations for this finding
F11 Page 26
The City of Ventura’s Community Development Department is unable to generate meaningful reports using EnerGov software. Building Better Together: Suggestions for Smoother Permitting Processes 11
No recommendations for this finding
F12 Page 27
The City of Ventura has not implemented several of the 2019 Matrix Consulting Group Report recommendations as highlighted in the Discussion Section of this report.
No recommendations for this finding
F13 Page 27
Lengthy delays in project approvals and increased costs are causing dissatisfaction among the development community and discouraging development activities.
No recommendations for this finding
F14 Page 27
Since 2020, assessed property values adjusted for inflation have not increased. This indicates that city services may be maintained but could be expanded by streamlining the approval process.
No recommendations for this finding
F15 Page 27
The lack of training on the EnerGov software system is causing inefficiency and workplace stress for entire divisions of the Community Development Department.
No recommendations for this finding
F16 Page 27
The staffs of the Community Development Department and the Information Technology Department are attempting to fix implementation and configuration deficiencies in using EnerGov software, causing increased workloads.
No recommendations for this finding
F17 Page 27
Utilizing the Historic Preservation Committee and the Design Review Committee in non-decision-making roles has delayed project approvals. RECOMMENDATIONS Oxnard
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 2

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Commendations 3

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.