Placer County Grand Jury
• 2001-2002
Solid Waste Management Follow up to 1996-97 Grand Jury Final Report
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
Many of the solid waste management contracts will be coming up for renewal in the near future. Decisions will need to be made as to whether a contract should be extended, renegotiated, or put out for bid.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Grand Jury believes that whenever possible, contracts should be put out for bid to ensure the County is getting the best possible price and service.
F2
The County is doing a good job with its solid waste management efforts and is commended by this Grand Jury.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Future Placer County Grand Juries should monitor solid waste management contracts as their expiration dates approach.
F3
To date, a conflict of interest has not arisen from the same individual serving on both the staff of the JPA and as a county employee.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
This situation should continue to be monitored by future Grand Juries. Respondents Director, Facilities Services Board of Supervisors County Executive Officer RESPONSES REQUIRED WITHIN 90 DAYS TO: The Honorable Judge James D. Garbolino Presiding Judge of the Superior Court County of Placer Historic Court House 101 Maple Street Auburn, California 95603
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Placer County
County