Score: 0 (0/24/0)
Santa Cruz County Grand Jury • 2016-2017

Santa Cruz County Domestic Violence Commission Missing in Action

Published: May 24, 2016 5 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1
The Domestic Violence Commission has not met since 2013.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
Domestic Violence Commission meetings should be held monthly during the first six months with the commission determining the ongoing meeting times and schedule. (F1)
R4
The Domestic Violence Commission should report to the Board of Supervisors quarterly for the first year and annually thereafter. (F1)
F2
A quorum was not reached at the majority of the 2013 meetings.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Board of Supervisors should reduce the Domestic Violence Commission membership from 28 to a workable number. (F2, F3)
F3
The mandated 24–28 person membership is too large.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Board of Supervisors should reduce the Domestic Violence Commission membership from 28 to a workable number. (F2, F3)
F4
The District Attorney’s Office has appointed a leader to organize the new Domestic Violence Commission.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The District Attorney (or their designee) should be the Domestic Violence Commission’s chair for at least the first year. (F4)
F5
There was universal concern that the dedicated Domestic Violence Court had been abandoned.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Board of Supervisors should direct the Domestic Violence Commission to investigate the re­establishment of the Domestic Violence Court. (F5)

Agency Responses 4

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.