Mariposa County Grand Jury

2022-2023

2 reports

From the annual report
The consolidated year-end volume. The individual investigations it contains are listed separately below.
📑 Year-End Report
The full consolidated volume; individual reports are listed below.
Individual reports (2)
Findings & Recommendations 3 findings
F1: The MCCGJ received only 42 of the required 50 responses to the investigative findings and
Page 6
Related Recommendations (1)
R1: Respondents should review California Penal Codes §933 annually in preparation for
F2: The MCCGJ received no responses to the 30 invitations to respond to the investigative
Page 6
Related Recommendations (1)
R2: Respondents should be aware and understand that some responses are required by California
F3: Some respondents did not make clear commitments (e.g., timeframes, further analysis) for
Page 6
Related Recommendations (1)
R3: Invited respondents should take the opportunity to prepare and submit responses when invited
Additional Recommendations 1

Not linked to specific findings.

R4: Respondents should include timeframes and commitments implementing agreeable
Page 6
Findings & Recommendations 3 findings
F1: The MCCGJ received only 42 of the required 50 responses to the investigative findings and
Page 6
Related Recommendations (1)
R1: Respondents should review California Penal Codes §933 annually in preparation for
F2: The MCCGJ received no responses to the 30 invitations to respond to the investigative
Page 6
Related Recommendations (1)
R2: Respondents should be aware and understand that some responses are required by California
F3: Some respondents did not make clear commitments (e.g., timeframes, further analysis) for
Page 6
Related Recommendations (1)
R3: Invited respondents should take the opportunity to prepare and submit responses when invited
Additional Recommendations 1

Not linked to specific findings.

R4: Respondents should include timeframes and commitments implementing agreeable
Page 6