Humboldt County 2024-2025 - California Grand Jury Reports

July 25, 2025 — Built to Burn? Emergency Access Challenges on Humboldt Hill Released July 30th, 2025

10 pages 3 findings 4 recommendations

Findings & Recommendations 3 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Residents of Humboldt Hill have not organized a Fire Safe Council or a Firewise Community to educate themselves and to prepare for possible wildfires or other environmental emergencies therefore leaving themselves vulnerable to potential harm. (R1, R2)

Related Recommendations (3)

R1: The Humboldt No. Fire Protection District Board of Directors direct the Chief of Humboldt Bay Fire to continue to work with residents of Humboldt Hill to develop a local Fire Safe Council. (F1)

R2: The Humboldt No. Fire Protection District Board of Directors direct the Chief of Humboldt Bay Fire to continue to work with residents of Humboldt Hill to develop a local Firewise Community. (F1)

R4: The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors direct the Planning & Building Department Director and relevant staff to expedite the completion of the latest subdivision plan in order to grant emergency access to Humboldt Hill residents. (F3) RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: • The respondent agrees with the finding; or • The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: • The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; or • The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation; or • The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report; or • The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (F2, F3) and (R3, R4) The Humboldt No. Fire Protection District Board of Directors (F1) and (R1, R2) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury also invites the following entities or individuals to respond. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) (F1) and (R1, R2) The Humboldt Community Services District (F2) and (R2) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury P.O. Box 657 Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is no secondary emergency evacuation route available to the residents of Humboldt Hill, leaving them open to harm in case of wildfire, earthquake, or other emergencies. (R3)

Related Recommendations (2)

R3: The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors schedule and participate in negotiations with private landowners and/or public utilities in order to grant emergency access to Humboldt Hill residents across their property and/or easements. This will be completed by no later than September 30, 2025. (F2)

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The latest proposed subdivision on Humboldt Hill includes a secondary access route open to residents in case of emergency. If completed as planned, this would provide improved safety for residents of Humboldt Hill. (R4)

Related Recommendations (1)

July 16, 2025 — Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office - Coroner Serving the Community, Involving the Community Released July 11th, 2025

11 pages 9 findings 3 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 9 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Coroner's Office staff and volunteers perform exemplary service and maintain investigational integrity while operating in an antiquated, undersized, and poorly maintained 3 NamUS https://namus.nij.ojp.gov/ facility. Providing this professional and respectful service benefits the community, deceased individuals, and their families.

Related Recommendations (1)

R3: The Humboldt County Sheriff installs a locking system on the evidence/storage room door by October 15, 2025, that differentiates between users, records date and time of entry/exit, and identifies each individual accessing the room. For funding recommendations, see the wording below recommendation #3. (F9) Funding Recommendation: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury recommends that the Humboldt County Sheriff coordinate with the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors to fund expenses specified in Recommendations R2 and R3 through appropriations in the upcoming fiscal year. Should funding prove insufficient, the Grand Jury recommends that the Humboldt County Sheriff and Board of Supervisors pursue additional funding from appropriate sources, including state or federal agencies. The Bureau of Justice Assistance offers grants through its Medical Examiner/Coroner System Program, as do the National Association of Medical Examiners and the Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: ● The respondent agrees with the finding; or ● The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding; in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: ● The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; or ● The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation; or ● The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report; or ● The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 60 DAYS The Humboldt County Sheriff (All findings, all recommendations) REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (All findings, all recommendations) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury also invites the following entities or individuals to respond. The Humboldt County Department of Public Works (F1, F8, F9) and (R2, R3) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury PO Box 657, Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Coroner’s Office staff and volunteers perform exemplary service and maintain investigational integrity while operating under severe budget and resource constraints. Providing this professional and respectful service benefits the community, deceased individuals, and their families.

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Coroner's Office relies substantially on volunteers, who collectively contributed 4,722 volunteer hours in 2024. This generated significant cost savings for the County while providing valuable training and experience to local medical students.

F4: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Dedicated staff have successfully produced a comprehensive 86-page Humboldt County Coroner's Office Policy & Procedures Manual. This manual will standardize practices, inform employees of policies, and serve as an operational reference guide.

F5: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Humboldt County Coroner's Register is maintained in both physical and digital formats. This enables efficient report generation from the digital version.

F6: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Safety Data Sheets for formaldehyde and other chemicals are readily available to the Coroners’ Office staff. This provides immediate access to safety protocols and ensures compliance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) requirements.

F7: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: A Sheriff's Office property technician has dedicated nine months to cataloging and organizing the evidence room to facilitate record digitization. The digital database will enhance record retrieval, sharing, and storage efficiency and reliability. (R1)

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Humboldt County Sheriff complete cataloging and organization of the evidence/storage room and enter all property information into a digital record system by April 1, 2026. (F7)

F8: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The existing counter surfaces and cabinets in the Coroner’s Office autopsy room are permeable, deteriorating, and fail to fail to comply with National Association of Medical Examiners standards. This creates safety risks and contamination hazards. (R2)

Related Recommendations (2)

R2: The Humboldt County Sheriff replace counter surfaces and cabinets with stainless steel or other non-permeable surfacing materials by January 1, 2026. For funding recommendations, see the wording below recommendation #3. (F8)

F9: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Coroner’s Office evidence/storage room access is controlled by a single code shared among all staff. The inability to identify specific room access creates risks of tampering, contamination, or loss of records, forensic evidence, cremated remains, and decedents' personal property. (R3)

Related Recommendations (1)

July 11, 2025 — Locked Up but Not Locked Out Inmate Voting Rights in Humboldt County Released July 11, 2025

6 pages 4 findings 1 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 4 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Voting procedures in the jail have improved, resulting in a record number of inmates voting.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: General election material is readily available to inmates, encouraging greater participation.

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is good coordination between the Office of Elections and Correctional staff. This allowed inmates to become better informed about candidates and issues that appeared on the ballot.

F4: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Humboldt County Correctional Facility is in the process of developing an Elections Manual to preserve and record effective inmate voting procedures for future guidance. (R1)

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Humboldt County Correctional Facility prepare an Elections Manual to be approved and adopted by the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office by no later than December 31, 2025. (F4) 3 North Coast Journal January 7, 2025 https://www.northcoastjournal.com/NewsBlog/archives/2025/01/07/exceptional-work-allowed-eligible- humboldt-jail-inmates-to-cast-ballots RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: • The respondent agrees with the finding; or • The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case, the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons, therefor. Responses to Recommendations shall one of the following: • The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; or • The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation; or • The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury report; or • The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable with an explanation, therefor. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 60 DAYS The Humboldt County Sheriff (All findings, all recommendations) REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (All findings, all recommendations) Invited responses The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury also invites the following entities or individuals to respond. The Humboldt County Registrar of Voters (All findings, all recommendations) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury PO Box 657, Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

June 20, 2025 — Scales of Justice Out of Balance?

34 pages 20 findings 20 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 20 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Public Defender’s Office consistently achieved successful outcomes in the majority of their cases in 2024, in spite of overwhelming caseloads and lack of resources. This reflects admirably on the office and builds a positive community perception of the Public Defender’s Office.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Public Defender’s Office staff is dedicated and committed to its mission which has inspired them to go above and beyond and, in the face of adverse circumstances, allow them to complete their mission.

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Public Defender’s Office has received few complaints from clients and only one time in the past three years has an attorney been removed from a case due to inadequate assistance of counsel establishing that they are competently and effectively serving their clients.

F4: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The building in which the Public Defender’s Office is housed is in poor condition and not well maintained. This presents health and safety risks, projects an unprofessional appearance, and negatively impacts staff morale. (R1)

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Board of Supervisors schedule the relocation of the Public Defender’s Office and approve funding for the relocation to a suitable office which is ADA-compliant. This is to be approved no later than June 30, 2026. (F4)

F5: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Public Defender’s office does not provide adequate security, creating an unsafe work environment. (R2, R3)

Related Recommendations (3)

R2: The Board of Supervisors direct the Department of Public Works to effect the installation of impenetrable barriers at all reception area counters in the Public Defender’s Office by October 1, 2025. (F5)

R3: The Board of Supervisors direct Public Works to effect the installation of a locking door between the public reception area and private area of the Public Defender’s Office by October 1, 2025. (F5)

R20: The Board of Supervisors approve and allocate funding, effective July 1, 2026, for the following additional full-time permanent positions at the Conflict Counsel’s Office, and direct the Human Resources Department to begin recruitment by July 1, 2026, to fill these positions: ● 4 Analysts ● 1 Investigator (F17, F18, F20) RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: ● The respondent agrees with the finding; or ● The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding; in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: ● The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; or ● The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation; or ● The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report; or ● The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (All findings, all recommendations) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury also invites the following entities or individuals to respond. The Humboldt County Public Defender (All findings, all recommendations) The Humboldt County Human Resources Department (F14) and (R14) The Humboldt County Department of Public Works (F5) and (R2, R3) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury PO Box 657; Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

F6: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is a sign with political content in the Public Defender’s Conference Room. This is a violation of the Humboldt County Policy. (R4)

Related Recommendations (1)

R4: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender to remove the sign in the Public Defender’s Conference Room that has political content be permanently removed by no later than October 1, 2025. (F6)

F7: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Low, non-competitive wages adversely affect recruitment and retention of attorneys in both the Public Defender’s Office and the Conflict Counsel’s Office. (R5)

Related Recommendations (1)

R5: The Board of Supervisors approve and fund a graduated pay scale increase over a six-year period for Public Defender and Conflict Counsel’s Offices’ attorney staff. Raise the pay scale, at a minimum, for Attorney I (step 1) to $5,575 per month and proportionally for all other grades and steps. This is to be implemented no later than July 1, 2026. Thereafter, by no later than July 1, 2031, raise the pay scale, at a minimum, for Attorney I (step 1) to $6,500 per month and proportionally for all other grades. (F7, F17, F18, F19, F20)

F8: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: District Attorney’s Office support staff and investigators are paid far more than their counterparts at the Public Defender's Office and Conflict Counsel's Office. This lack of parity in pay disadvantages the Public Defender’s Office in recruiting and retaining staff, and adversely affects staff morale. (R6, R7)

Related Recommendations (2)

R6: The Board of Supervisors approve and budget funds to reclassify the Public Defender and Conflict Counsel’s Offices’ Legal Secretaries to Administrative Analysts to be comparable to the District Attorney’s Office where they are classified as Analysts, effective no later than July 1, 2026. (F8, F9, F17, F18, F19, F20)

R7: The Board of Supervisors approve and budget funds to set the pay scale of the Public Defender and Conflict Counsel’s Offices’ investigators to be in parity with that of investigators employed by the District Attorney no later than July 1, 2026. (F8, F9, F17, F18, F19, F20)

F9: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: District Attorney’s Office support staff and investigators are paid far more than their counterparts at the Public Defender's Office and Conflict Counsel's Office. This gives an unfair advantage to the District Attorney’s Office in terms of the resources available to attorneys and staff to do their job. (R6, R7)

Related Recommendations (2)

F10: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Investigators in both the Public Defender’s and Conflict Counsel’s offices do not have a video camera or dashcams to document their work. This reduces effective surveillance, is insufficient and unsafe. (R8, R9)

Related Recommendations (2)

R8: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender to purchase one video camera and portable dashcam for use by investigators by October 1, 2025. (F10)

R9: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender to purchase one video camera and portable dashcam for use by Conflict Counsel’s Office investigators by October 1, 2025. (F10)

F11: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is little to no training for newly hired attorneys and investigators in the Public Defender’s Office. This is an ineffective way to familiarize them with office, investigative and court procedures and practices. (R10)

Related Recommendations (1)

R10: The Public Defender write and implement a training policy and materials for newly hired attorneys and investigators by January 1, 2026. (F11)

F12: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is little supervision, oversight or management of investigators and their cases in the Public Defender’s Office. This causes inefficiencies and morale issues. (R11)

Related Recommendations (1)

R11: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender to create and implement a plan to coordinate management of investigations, and to provide supervision and oversight to investigators by December 1, 2025. (F12)

F13: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is no permanent Social Worker position funded at either the Public Defender’s Office or Conflict Counsel’s Office. Funding is being diverted from other office budgets to temporarily fund these positions. This reduces the ability of both offices to meet all of their financial needs. (R12, R13)

Related Recommendations (2)

R12: The Board of Supervisors authorizes funding to support the addition of a permanent, full- time Social Worker position at the Public Defender’s Office effective July 1, 2026. (F13)

R13: The Board of Supervisors authorizes funding to support the addition of a permanent, full- time Social Worker position at the Conflict Counsel’s Office effective July 1, 2026. (F13)

F14: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Humboldt County Human Resources hiring application, review and selection process can take many months, which leads some applicants giving up and looking elsewhere. This negatively impacts the Public Defender’s ability to fill positions, to be a competitive employer, and it burdens staff with more work covering cases until vacant positions can be filled. (R14)

Related Recommendations (2)

R14: The Board of Supervisors direct Humboldt County Human Resources to establish a policy that applicant processing for non-management positions will be completed within six weeks. This is to be implemented by January 1, 2026. (F14)

F15: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is no Policy and Procedures Manual for either the Public Defender’s Office or the Conflict Counsel’s Office. This impedes guidance to staff and continuity of services. (R15)

Related Recommendations (1)

R15: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender to create and implement a comprehensive Policy and Procedures Manual for use by the Public Defender and Conflict Counsel’s Office by May 1, 2026. (F15)

F16: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Staff Performance Reviews for the Public Defender’s Office attorneys, investigators and some support staff are not conducted with any regularity. This deprives staff of feedback, guidance, confirmation, commendation, and it denies them the documentation necessary to support recommendations for promotion, non-promotion or termination. (R16)

Related Recommendations (1)

R16: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender to create, implement and maintain a periodic Performance Review plan for all staff by December 1, 2025. (F16)

F17: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Caseloads in both the Public Defender’s Office and Conflict Counsel’s Office are dangerously high, exceeding recommended levels. This overburdens staff, causes occupational stress and increases the chances that the offices will lose valuable, experienced staff to burnout and addiction. (R5, R6, R7, R17, R18, R19, R20)

Related Recommendations (6)

R17: The Board of Supervisors approve a policy permitting Emotional Support dogs in the Public Defender and Conflict Counsel’s Offices until the County makes proactive counseling to prevent burnout and other stress relief available. This is to be completed by October 31, 2025. (F17)

R18: The Board of Supervisors direct the Public Defender write and implement policies on the introduction of Emotional Support dogs until the County makes proactive counseling to prevent burnout and other stress relief available. This is to be completed by October 31, 2025. (F17)

F18: Caseloads in both the Public Defender’s Office and Conflict Counsel’s Office are dangerously high, exceeding recommended levels. This puts justice, fairness, adequacy of representation and freedom at risk. (R5, R6, R7, R19, R20)

Related Recommendations (4)

F19: There is not enough Public Defender’s Office staff to effectively defend clients. This increases caseload ratios and contributes to staff burnout and lower retention rates. (R5, R6, R7,

Related Recommendations (4)

R19: The Board of Supervisors approve and allocate funding effective July 1, 2026, for the following additional full-time permanent positions at the Public Defender’s Office, and direct Human Resources to begin recruitment by July 1, 2026, to fill these positions: ● 3 Attorneys (to achieve parity with the District Attorney’s Office) ● 5 Full-Time Analysts ● 1 Part-Time Analyst ● 3 Investigators ( F17, F18, F19)

F20: There is not enough Conflict Counsel’s Office staff to effectively defend clients. This increases caseloads and adds to staff burnout. (R5, R6, R7, R20)

Related Recommendations (4)

June 17, 2025 — Wings Over Humboldt County Charting a New Course for the Department of Aviation Released July 30th, 2025

23 pages 12 findings 6 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 12 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Creating a Department of Aviation has improved operations and management, thus providing greater opportunity for growth and revenue. Lochner summary: https://www.flyacv.com/DocumentCenter/View/422/Airport-System-Plan- Summary-with-Overview-and-Recommended-Developments

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Aviation management and staff are well qualified and experienced, ensuring that facilities and operations are maintained for public safety.

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Compliance with Federal Aviation Administration requirements is critical for the Department of Aviation to successfully apply for and receive grant funds to undertake major safety projects at all six airports.

F4: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: In 2024, the Department of Aviation was awarded Federal Aviation Administration grant funding of just under $1.9 million. This allowed the Department to make capital improvements at the airports in Rohnerville, Garberville and McKinleyville.

F5: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Commercial air service is currently available to the east and south. Establishing air service to the north would result in increased revenue because passengers would be less likely to start their journey at another airport.

F6: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Department of Aviation has been collaborating with Project SOAR (Sourcing Opportunities for Airport Revenues). This promotes economic development at the airports. (R1)

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of the Department of Aviation to continue their collaboration with Project SOAR (Sourcing Opportunities for Airport Revenues) to attract revenue-generating businesses to non-aeronautical land at the airports. (F6)

F7: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The focus of the current Aviation Advisory Committee has primarily been on airport operations. The committee could be better utilized by focusing on broader economic development. (R2)

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: The Board of Supervisors continue to evaluate the composition, role and responsibilities of the Aviation Advisory Committee. (F7)

F8: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Dinsmore landing strip is threatened by river encroachment. This necessitates constructing a dike to protect the runway or repurposing the site solely as a medivac heliport. (R3)

Related Recommendations (1)

R3: The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of the Department of Aviation to review the specific 2017 Volaire report recommendations regarding the future of Murray Field, Dinsmore, and Kneeland airports. This direction to Aviation shall be made by no later than December 31, 2025. (F8, F9, F10)

F9: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Landslides have shortened the effective length of the Kneeland landing strip. Restoration will require an environmental impact report and repairs likely costing millions of dollars. (R3)

Related Recommendations (1)

F10: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Murray Field Airport is below sea level and sinking. In the long term, the airport will need to be either closed or reconstructed; reconstruction would require obtaining a California Coastal Commission permit. (R3)

Related Recommendations (1)

F11: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Many of the 2017 Volaire report recommendations have been implemented, but several could still be implemented. Revisiting those recommendations would provide opportunities for expansion, commercial development, increased public safety, and increased revenues. (R4)

Related Recommendations (1)

R4: The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of the Department of Aviation to review the 2017 Volaire report. The Director will report a plan for possible implementation of Volaire recommendations to the Board of Supervisors by no later than December 31, 2025. (F11)

F12: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Airport hangars and other infrastructure at the smaller airports are in disrepair due to long- term deferred maintenance. Delaying repairs accelerates damage and can significantly increase the final cost of repair, as well as foster dissatisfaction among hangar tenants. (R5, R6)

Related Recommendations (2)

R5: The Board of Supervisors direct the Director of the Department of Aviation to develop a hangar repair plan, by December 31, 2025, to bring hangars up to commercial standards. (F12)

R6: The Board of Supervisors allocate all hangar rental revenue, as well as seek other funding sources as needed to implement the hangar repair plan developed by the Department of Aviation. To be done by June 30, 2026. (F12) RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: • The respondent agrees with the finding; or • The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding; in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: • The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; or • The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation; or • The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report; or • The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (All findings, all recommendations) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury also invites the following entities or individuals to respond. The Humboldt County Department of Aviation (All findings, all recommendations) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury PO Box 657, Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

June 05, 2025 — California State Prison - Eel River Fire Camp #31 From Incarceration to Firefighting: Pathways to Second Chances

8 pages 3 findings 1 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 3 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Eel River Fire Conservation Camp is well-maintained by both staff and inmates. This supports the mission and function of the camp.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Eel River Fire Conservation Camp provide opportunities for inmates to obtain training, enhance skills, and advance their education. This lowers the recidivism rate.

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Due to the remoteness of the location, and inadequate staff housing, it is difficult for the Eel River Fire Conservation Camp to hire and retain staff. (R1)

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: Additional permanent staff housing be constructed to provide housing for current and future staff. This is to be completed by June 30, 2026. (F3) Funding Recommendation: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury recommends that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation fund the expenses listed in

June 04, 2025 — Sempervirens Psychiatric Health Facility a Key Support System for Humboldt County Released July 11th, 2025

10 pages 8 findings 3 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 8 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Sempervirens is playing an important role for those experiencing acute mental health issues in Humboldt County, providing an important service to the patients and the broader community.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is considerable emphasis on the safety of patients and staff by minimizing injuries, self-harm, and potential liability. This enhances the trust and security in the patient-staff relationship.

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Patients are provided with extensive services to improve their mental health and prepare for discharge. Strong patient involvement helps ensure that the discharge process provides optimal patient success upon release.

F4: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There are clear patients’ rights that are provided in writing to all patients on intake. These give patients more confidence in their safety and security.

F5: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: There is a Patients’ Rights Advocate available to assist patients in learning, understanding, and exercising their rights; the Advocate also monitors the facility to ensure that it complies with the law. These actions provide patients' safety and security.

F6: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Sempervirens facility is very old and in disrepair. The Crisis Stabilization Unit is unusable for significant periods of time when the roof leaks; this greatly compromises the use of Sempervirens facilities. (R1)

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: The leaky roof be repaired as quickly as possible. The Board of Supervisors should direct the Public Works Department to complete roof repairs by September 30, 2025. (F6)

F7: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Sempervirens program is currently understaffed. SV needs to be fully staffed to meet the community's needs for acute mental health services while ensuring the well-being of patients and staff. (R2, R3)

Related Recommendations (2)

R2: The vacant positions for Sempervirens be filled as soon as possible. If the vacant positions are subject to the hiring freeze, the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors should exempt the positions from the freeze by no later than August 1, 2025. (F7)

R3: The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors streamline hiring procedures in order to complete all evaluations and hiring within six weeks. This is to be completed by December 31, 2025. (F7, F8) RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: ● The respondent agrees with the finding, or ● The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding; in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: ● The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action, or ● The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation or ● The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency, where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report; or ● The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (All Findings, all Recommendations) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury also invites the following entities or individuals to respond. The Department of Health and Human Services (All Findings, all Recommendations) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury PO Box 657, Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

F8: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The County often takes three to six months to complete the hiring process, and by that time, the interested professional often has moved on and sought another position. This negatively impacts the recruitment of personnel to fill vacancies at Sempervirens. (R3)

Related Recommendations (1)

May 27, 2025 — Humboldt County Animal Shelter Animal Shelter + Animal Rescues = Lifesaving Paw-tnership "The greatness of a community

8 pages 6 findings 5 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 6 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The staff of the Humboldt County Animal Shelter are dedicated. Their efforts allow them to work effectively under the stress of handling high volumes of animals with less than a full staff. (R1)

Related Recommendations (2)

R1: Collaboration between the Animal Shelter and the animal rescue network, in a professional and respectful manner, should continue as it is beneficial to the animals and everyone involved. (F1, F2)

R5: The Animal Shelter includes weekend hours by no later than September 1, 2025. (F6) RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, each entity or individual named below must respond to the enumerated Findings and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: ● The respondent agrees with the finding; or ● The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: ● The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; or ● The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation; or ● The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report; or ● The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefore. REQUIRED RESPONSE - WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5) and (R2, R3, R4, R5) REQUIRED RESPONSE - WITHIN 60 DAYS The Humboldt County Sheriff (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5) and (R1, R5) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Department of Public Works (F4, F5) and (R3, R4) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street, Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury PO Box 657, Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Collaboration between the Animal Shelter and the local benefit our community. (R1)

Related Recommendations (2)

R1: Collaboration between the Animal Shelter and the animal rescue network, in a professional and respectful manner, should continue as it is beneficial to the animals and everyone involved. (F1, F2)

F3: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Volunteers donate approximately 400 hours per month. Their crucial contribution to animal enrichment by socializing, walking, and training animals is a factor in increasing adoptions and meeting other needs of the Animal Shelter. (R2)

Related Recommendations (2)

R2: The Board of Supervisors shall establish a Volunteer Appreciation Day for all Humboldt County Volunteers on April 20th, which is National Volunteer Recognition Day, by October 1, 2025. (F3)

F4: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Long-standing leaks have led to a severely damaged roof that houses necessary mechanical equipment for the Animal Shelter. This damage can significantly impact staff and animal health and safety. (R3)

Related Recommendations (2)

R3: The Board of Supervisors direct the Department of Public Works to complete the reroofing of the Animal Shelter and any necessary repairs by no later than October 31, 2025. (F4)

F5: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The outside lighting at the Animal Shelter needs replacement and repair; this poses a safety concern for both staff and visitors, especially during the winter hours. (R4)

Related Recommendations (2)

R4: The Board of Supervisors direct the Department of Public Works to complete the replacement and repair of outside lighting at the Animal Shelter by no later than December 31, 2025. (F5)

F6: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Animal Shelter is only open to the public from Monday to Friday. Offering operational hours on the weekend would increase the rate of adoptions. (R5)

Related Recommendations (1)

May 27, 2025 — Pension Tension Relieved?

9 pages 2 findings 8 recommendations

Quick View Full Details →

Findings & Recommendations 2 findings

F1: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: In February of 2017 the County adopted a pension funding policy of contributing an additional 2% of payroll into the Section 115 Irrevocable Trust. As a result the County has put in place a mechanism to responsibly manage its unfunded pension liabilities.

Related Recommendations (1)

R1: By no later than the end of the second quarter (December 31) of each fiscal year the County’s Chief Administrative Officer shall issue a report regarding the pension funding policy obligations to the citizens of Humboldt County to be posted on the County’s website.

F2: The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury finds that: The Pension Funding Policy states that actuarial valuations be posted annually to the County website. Actuarial valuations alone do not provide citizens with adequate information to understand the Unfunded Accrued Liabilities situation, neither in the short term nor in the long term. (R1-R8)

Related Recommendations (1)

R2: The annual report should contain a section listing the total dollar amounts that the County Board of Supervisors authorized to contribute in the previous fiscal year to the CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liabilities account, and to the Section 115 Trust. The report should include a brief discussion of the strategy behind contributing these amounts. It should also include an explanation if the amounts contributed were different than those recommended by the Chief Administrative Officer’s office under the County’s Pension Funding Policy.

Additional Recommendations 6

Not linked to specific findings.

R3: The annual report should contain a section listing the dollar amounts that the Chief Administrative Officer’s office recommends that the County contribute in the current fiscal year to the CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability account and the Section 115 trust. It should include a brief discussion of the strategy behind contributing these amounts.

R4: The annual report should contain a section with a running historical account updated each fiscal year in the form of a table, showing the amount of money deposited into the Section 115 Trust each fiscal year, the rate of return earned in the trust (both as percentage and a dollar amount), and the rate of return that the funds would have earned had they been deposited with CalPERS (again as a percentage and dollar amount), along with a total of the dollar amounts at the bottom of each column.

R5: The annual report should contain a section with a running historical account updated each year in the form of a graph showing the actual interest earned during each fiscal year in the Section 115 Trust vs. the estimated interest that would have been earned had the money been invested with CalPERS in the Unfunded Accrued Liabilities account.

R6: The annual report should contain a section with a brief discussion of the management fees charged by Public Agency Retirement Services and those charged by CalPERS (if any), as well as the impact of all fees on the fund’s returns.

R7: The annual report should contain a brief discussion of the County’s long-term strategy for paying into the Unfunded Accrued Liability account and an assessment of the County’s progress in implementing that strategy, including a projection of when the Unfunded Accrued Liability will be funded at 100% based on the County’s current strategy.

R8: The annual report should contain any other information the County thinks would be useful in helping the citizens of Humboldt County understand the scope of the County’s Unfunded Accrued Liability obligations and how the County is working to mitigate them. RESPONSES Pursuant to California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, the Grand Jury requests each entity or individual named below to respond to the enumerated Finding and Recommendations within specific statutory guidelines. Responses to Findings shall be either: ● The respondent agrees with the finding; ● The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: ● The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. ● The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation. ● The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency where applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of the Grand Jury report. ● The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefore. REQUIRED RESPONSE – WITHIN 90 DAYS The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (All findings, all recommendations) Invited Responses The Humboldt County Chief Administrative Officer (All findings, all recommendations) The Humboldt County Auditor Controller (All findings, all recommendations) Responses are to be sent to: The Honorable Judge Kelly L. Neel Humboldt County Superior Court 825 5th Street Eureka, CA 95501 The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury P.O. Box 657 Eureka, CA 95502 A Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.